The stipulated line chart depicts pollution levels in city of London in a span of four and a half centuries from 1550 to 2000. The mentioned parameters are sulfur dioxide and smoke.
It is clear from the data that during the 15nth century, the air was very clear and there was no sign of pollutants like sulfur dioxide and smoke. But in 1580 on wards the figures showed some signs of pollution started of with a very little figure 1 micro grams of sulfur dioxide per cubic meter. Then it was gradually increased and reached not so high indicator of 800 micro grams per cubic meter in 1725. After that it showed some fluctuations till the year of 1850, where it topped with a record level of sulfur content (900 micro grams/cubic meter). From 1851, the indicators showed a sign of decline of sulfur content in the city except in 1880, in the end of millennium it reached the same point where all it started (almost 0).
The presence of smoke in the air also showed the similar trend, the earlier millennia witnessed no smoke at all just the clear air. After some period, it also showed some presence in the atmosphere from the year 1850 to be exact. It indicated a slow rise for almost 3 centuries till 1880, where it soar to a figure of 450 micro grams per cubic meter. After this point, the indicators showed sign of fall and some severe downward fluctuations for almost 40 years (1920 to 1940). Then it dip in to the lowest figure in 2000.
In conclusion, both pollution contents showed an increasing trend for a period of 3 millenniums, but the sulfur dioxide presence was very high as compared smock figures during the mentioned period. But in the end both figures touched the 0 point level.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 252, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 1850 to be exact. It showed a slow rise for almost 3 centuries till 1880, where ...
^^
Line 5, column 297, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'soars'?
Suggestion: soars
... almost 3 centuries till 1880, where it soar to a figure of 450 micro grams per cubi...
^^^^
Line 5, column 417, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: some
...ators showed sign of fall and indicated some some severe downward fluctuations for almost...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 498, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'dips'?
Suggestion: dips
...r almost 40 years 1920 to 1940. Then it dip in to the lowest figure in 2000. In ...
^^^
Line 7, column 134, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: very
...ms, but the sulfur dioxide presence was very very high as compared smock figures during t...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, then, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1360.0 965.302439024 141% => OK
No of words: 297.0 196.424390244 151% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.57912457912 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 3.73543355544 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36543908539 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 106.607317073 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.478114478114 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 406.8 283.868780488 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7198319591 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.615384615 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8461538462 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.61538461538 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0627242858814 0.215688989381 29% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0258222504991 0.103423049105 25% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0206285650685 0.0843802449381 24% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0374988510748 0.15604864568 24% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0254757591287 0.0819641961636 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.58 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.