The given pie charts compare Japan and Malaysia in terms of percentages of average domestic expenses in 2010.
Overall, there were 5 inevitable household expenditures paid by residents of both nations. In addition, considerable differences can be observed between figures for Japan and Malaysia.
Turning into detail, it is evident that percentages occupied by transport and healthcare payment of Japanese were exactly 2 times higher than those of Malaysian. Particularly, while the figure of medication category for Japan was 6%, that of Malaysian accounted for only 3%. Likewise, transport section in Japan occupied 20% of total expenditures, followed by a exactly-10-percent number of Malaysian in this year.
Regarding to 3 remain expenses, in comparison to accommodation category of Japanese, which accounted for 21% of the whole payment, the figure for Malaysia was significantly higher, displayed by a noticeable number of 34%. Meanwhile, propotion of expense for nourishment paid by Malaysian was slightly higher than that of Japanese, with 27% and 24%, respectively. By contrast, unlike Malaysia, in which unspecified goods and services only accounted for 26%, the figure of Japanese reach the peak of 29%, ranking first amongs 5 considered sections of this country.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 361, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... 20% of total expenditures, followed by a exactly-10-percent number of Malaysian ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, likewise, regarding, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1093.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.63402061856 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22662708253 2.65546596893 122% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623711340206 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 338.4 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3797472231 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.444444444 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5555555556 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12503918714 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0608857145041 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0681252432681 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107084247008 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.080628628563 0.0819641961636 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 61.2550243902 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 11.4140731707 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.05 8.06136585366 125% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 40.7170731707 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.