The presented pie charts compare Japan and Malaysia citizens in terms of how they distributed their incomes among 5 counterparts in 2010.
Overall, housing, food as well as other goods and services were three categories into which residents channeled most proportions of their budget in both nations. However, while other goods and services ranked first among 5 items in Japan, people tended to prioritize their expenditure on housing in Malaysia.
Turning into detail, the percentages of housing and transport displayed significant gaps between two regions. Specifically, Malaysian people spent 34% of their account on housing, while the rate of Japanese was considerably lower, with 21%. By contrast, in comparison to the expense for transport in Malaysia, which was 10%, an exactly – 20 – per – cent figure for Japan was two times higher.
Regarding to remaining categories, a gap of 3% between the figures for same items in both countries can be observed. Indeed, with 29% and 6%, respectively, unspecified goods and services, along with healthcare, accounted for higher rates of total income in Japan than they did in Malaysia. Unlike these two sectors, a 24-per-cent number occupied by food in Japan was slightly lower than its value in Malaysia, which was 27%.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, regarding, so, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1081.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29901960784 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81467753928 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642156862745 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 314.1 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 19.6399693244 43.030603864 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 120.111111111 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107045394031 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0460527412952 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0513780743511 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0782691728638 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0472950098241 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.06136585366 121% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 40.7170731707 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.