The given chart illustrates the percentage of children attending four various secondary schools for a period of 9 years from 2000 to 2009. The mentioned parameters are specialist schools, grammar schools, voluntary - controlled schools and community schools.
It is clear from the data that voluntary controlled schools accommodated almost half (52%) of the students population in 2000. Whereas, the specialist schools (12%) and community schools (12%) received least number of children during the same time. Grammar schools housed almost twice as many students as compared to least populated schools, which is 24%.
A detailed view of the table shows that as years goes by every schools lost it's acceptance except community schools. In the begging it had only received 12% of total students numbers but in the end the proportion was almost six folded and claiming half of the total school goers. Among these 9 years of time specialist schools' always be the least popular one among the others. In addition, voluntary controlled schools lost its fame drastically from 52% to 20% in the end.
In conclusion, voluntary controlled schools and community schools were always prominent among students during the mentioned period and other two were the least approved secondary schools.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 97, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...ols accommodated almost half 52% of the students population in 2000. Whereas, the specia...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 188, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'received the least'.
Suggestion: received the least
...t schools 12% and community schools 12% received least number of children during the same time...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 309, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'to the least'.
Suggestion: to the least
...most twice as many students as compared to least populated schools, which is 24%. A d...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 167, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...gging it had only received 12% of total students numbers but in the end the proportion w...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 249, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'half' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'halves'.
Suggestion: halves
...tion was almost six folded and claiming half of the total school goers. Among these ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, second, whereas, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1080.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37313432836 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67676705276 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52736318408 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.6694777688 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.0 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 5.23603664747 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128756305207 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0600981962243 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0441458594751 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0897672547758 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0281404298791 0.0819641961636 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.