A growing number of people believe that parents are not ideal for providing education to their children. I am totally in favour of this idea. This essay will discuss the benefits and drawbacks for youngsters who plan to follow this type of system with relevant examples.
Let us begin by looking at an advantage of giving education at home by parents. Feeling comfortable and sounding confident by youngsters are by far the most important positive of it. It is well known to everyone that the caregivers gain considerable experience in child's development. Needless to say, they know how to deal with their loved ones better than anyone, which can prove advantageous for tutoring them. Despite the unnecessary demands of kids, guardians are found to express genuine affections and become unduly lenient. As a consequence, teenagers feel very ecstatic and remain utterly determined. Unlike in schools, teachers may hand out punishments and get bullied by classmates for showing the similar necessities as in the home.
Nevertheless, I would argue that pupils tend to be deprived of social skills, discipline and the rest others and eventually might end in failure if the youths received learning from their parents in the bosom. This can be exemplified by the lack of peers who would otherwise usually participate in detailed discussions and encourage in an effective team work. Making matters worse, the little ones usually show lax disciplines owing to the exhibition of exemplary behaviours from the begetters, so the majority of them disappointingly result in breakdowns. In addition, knowledge demonstrated by the forebearers are nowhere near as vast as the teachers because they may not show profound knowledge in various subjects as history, maths and science.
In conclusion, there are highest possibilities that the children become unimaginative, relaxed and along with others at home education. Thus, this type of teaching by parents ought to be discouraged.
Essay evaluation report
Feeling comfortable and sounding confident by youngsters are by far the most important positive of it.
Feeling comfortable and sounding confident by youngsters are by far the most important positives of it.
Needless to say, they know how to deal with their loved ones better than anyone, which can prove advantageous for tutoring them.
Description: 'them' refers to what? Be sensitive to use pronouns.
Making matters worse, the little ones usually show lax disciplines owing to the exhibition of exemplary behaviours from the begetters, so the majority of them disappointingly result in breakdowns.
Description: 'them' refers to what? Be sensitive to use pronouns.
In addition, knowledge demonstrated by the forebearers are nowhere near as vast as the teachers because they may not show profound knowledge in various subjects as history, maths and science.
Description: 'they' refers to what? Be sensitive to use pronouns.
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 16 15
No. of Words: 312 350
No. of Characters: 1623 1500
No. of Different Words: 201 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.203 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.202 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.913 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 125 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 103 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 71 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 49 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.5 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.15 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.438 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.266 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.485 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.047 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 22, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'are the highest'.
Suggestion: are the highest
...hs and science. In conclusion, there are highest possibilities that the children become ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, may, nevertheless, so, thus, well, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1668.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34615384615 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99190777984 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647435897436 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.7058615165 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.25 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.4375 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227535834936 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0633827309337 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0642356690067 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13392489768 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0531712662918 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.