It is true that our world is getting more polluted day by day. People and companies have a major role in this dilemma . Thus I strongly recommend that they should pay for cleaning the waste products they expelled from their house and factories.
To begin with, individuals mainly polluting the atmosphere by throwing waste products out from their houses and using more plastic materials. In many big cities around the globe people throwing out their household wastes. This growing amount of waste products cannot clean by government alone because they have a limited amount of money in order to give all the basic facilities they should give to their citizens such as education, health care e.t.c. So it is a big burden for them to bear the heavy expenses for waste removal. Another important polluting agent by people is plastic. The soaring use of plastic for the household purpose also pollute the Earth. Hence, it is a good idea impose taxation on individuals in the same proportion of waste products they expel from their houses
.
Companies mainly polluting the air and water by expelling their toxic by-products into them. For instance, the toxic gasses coming out from fossil fuel refineries, they contaminate the air very badly. Another pollution they do to nature is that contaminate the rivers with chemicals they expel from factories. The Kaveri river in South India is the clear example for this. There are many factories is there at the shore of this river, however, unfortunately, all these factories contaminating this river dangerously.
To conclude, individuals and companies polluting the environment with the waste products they expel. Therefore, it is better to impose a fine for the cleaning of these pollutants.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 119, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...panies have a major role in this dilemma . Thus I strongly recommend that they sho...
^^
Line 1, column 122, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ies have a major role in this dilemma . Thus I strongly recommend that they should p...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lled from their house and factories. To begin with, individuals mainly pollut...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 800, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...e products they expel from their houses . Companies mainly polluting ...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oducts they expel from their houses . Companies mainly polluting the air and w...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... contaminating this river dangerously. To conclude, individuals and companies p...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, so, therefore, thus, for instance, such as, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1456.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12676056338 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64648129969 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545774647887 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 58.8407543714 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.0 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.75 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6875 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220356945318 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0781055936667 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0533696279636 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152604826346 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0387742896122 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.