People, nowadays, prefer to commute to different regions of the world in search of different things. Some people have an argument that those who are traveling to another nation suffers from the problem of homesickness. This essay will eventually discuss the reasons for the above cause and the best ways to tackle the above difficulty.
People have a tendency to miss their house when they are abroad. The main reason for this situation is a cultural shock; they could not easily acclimatize with the masses of other cultures. Also, the language barrier is also one of the causes as they do not understand their native language. Moreover, food allergy might occur when they are in a new location. Take, for example, my brother faced the problem of feating boiled fish when he.was in Thailand. So, due to the above reasons, they may find difficult to overcome such a situation and they continuously want to come home.
In order to tackle the problem of homesickness, travelers should understand the language and culture of the destination nation, so they could easily survive easily in that nation. Also, they could also contact their family members with the help of various technological apps such as messenger, emo so that they could meet the desire to meet their relatives. Similarly, various unions of similar groups could also be established to listen to the problems of their members. Hence, if the above things are done, this will adhere to eradicate the problem of homesickness.
To recapitulate, the masses will encounter the feeling of missing home when they are abroad. The language barrier, cultural shocks are likely to be reasons for this problem, however, in-depth study of that nation and continuous contact with family members helps to reduce it. Personally, i believe travelling in a group in a foreign land also helps to minimise the problem of homesickness.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 289, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...members helps to reduce it. Personally, i believe travelling in a group in a fore...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, if, may, moreover, similarly, so, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1579.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07717041801 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6559368747 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.533762057878 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.6606314859 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.6875 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4375 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163462093296 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0583423334939 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0657209280684 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121046667122 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0696559379182 0.056905535591 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.