Some parents buy their children whatever they ask for, and allow their children
to do whatever they want.
Is this a good way to raise children?
What consequences could this style of parenting have for children as they get
older?
In this 21st century, the condition of most families has grown so that they can help their children live in a better condition than in the past. Because the condition is better so some parents always pamper their children, buy their children whatever they ask for, and permit their children to do anything. In my opinion, it is a negative way to bring up and educate children because the parent’s action will affect their children.
It is undeniable that it meets all of the child’s needs and wants is the wrong method. Parents who prefer this method maybe work very hard to afford youngsters things, and this can make their children become more selfish. For instance, if parents can’t buy the toy they want, they will become aggressive and destructive. Children will be lazier if parents pamper they too much that can be seen clearly in the child’s skills such as when they eat, parents still spoon-feed their children. In addition, children can’t make friends with other children and they will not obey the rule or anything set by parents or schools.
There are many risks related to this style of parenting when children get older. Children can become useless people because they can’t do anything as a result of their parents who allow them to do anything. When children get older, they might not have a job to earn money, they just depend on their parents. Moreover, they do not obey the rules so which can lead to stealing when they become adults. This will have a bad impact on the community.
In conclusion, this style of parenting will not a good way to raise children so that parents should change their mind and their method to educate their children. They need to be strict when their children do not obey the rules or do the wrong thing.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-19 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 84 | view |
| 2023-05-04 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 73 | view |
| 2022-02-24 | ojehparvaz | 83 | view |
| 2022-02-24 | ojehparvaz | 73 | view |
| 2022-02-24 | ojehparvaz | 56 | view |
- some people think that large impressive buildings are important for a city Others believe that the money should be spent on improving schools and hospitals Discuss both these views and give your own opinions Give reasons for your answer and include any re 62
- the diagrams below show two methods of collecting water for irrigation purposes Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relvevant 78
- Write about the following topic Some people say that tourism has many negative effects on the countries that people travel to How true is this statement What can tourists do to reduce the harmful effects of tourism on local cultures and environments Give 81
- Some parents buy their children whatever they ask for and allow their children to do whatever they want Is this a good way to raise children What consequences could this style of parenting have for children as they get older 56
- The table below shows the television viewing figures for sports by country in millions Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 32, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ildren. It is undeniable that it meets all of the child’s needs and wants is the wrong me...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, moreover, so, still, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 24.0651302605 170% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1461.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72815533981 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30337063468 2.80592935109 82% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.482200647249 0.561755894193 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 413.1 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.60771543086 81% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.1265618283 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.4 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.13333333333 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.636904396279 0.244688304435 260% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.25174583832 0.084324248473 299% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121602148705 0.0667982634062 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.452493419663 0.151304729494 299% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0385092154044 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 50.2224549098 152% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.3001002004 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 12.4159519038 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.13 8.58950901804 83% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 78.4519038076 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.