Some people opine that zoos are brutal and should be closed; however, others claim that zoos are beneficial for protecting rare animals, with which I am in complete agreement.
On the one hand, it is often believed that zoos should be closed. The proponents of this opinion highlight the artificial environment provided by zoos which might have myriads of detrimental impacts on animal's both physical and mental well-being. When animals are kept in captivity, they often have restricted areas to move around which is quite less in comparison with their natural habitats where unlimited moving, jumping and climbing are not curbed. Moreover, in many cases, animals live in groups in the wild. If they are put behind the bars without constructive interactions with their peers, they will be isolated, making them more depressed. Finally, what necessitates closing zoos, even more, is the point that, in many places, zoo-keepers are not trained properly. Such staff does not have the skills and knowledge required to fulfil their duties and responsibilities, causing unpleasant experiences for captivated animals.
On the other hand, some people think that zoos are indisputably useful to protect rare animals. They emphasise that zoos are well-designed and well-catered places which animals not only are looked after accordingly but also are kept safe of illegal hunting and poaching which might be the primary reason behind their increasing extinction. Furthermore, when rare animals are kept in zoos, they have a chance to benefit from rehabilitation and breeding programmes. That is to say, scientists can easily have access to study animals' behaviour and traits and help such creatures to return to life and reproduce again. These advantages do not exist for rare animals when they are living in their natural habitats.
In conclusion, after hashing out both points of views, it appears to me that zoos are quite influential for rare and endangered animals, as long as such places are equipped with well-educated staff and are monitored constantly.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, finally, furthermore, however, if, look, moreover, so, well, as to, in conclusion, in many cases, on the other hand, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 7.30460921844 233% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1737.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34461538462 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80792791425 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581538461538 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 540.0 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.8627229305 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.071428571 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2142857143 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0714285714 7.06120827912 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286254395675 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110166607105 0.084324248473 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.148736596576 0.0667982634062 223% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209385071484 0.151304729494 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123083283678 0.056905535591 216% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.