In this modern world, where every content could be found from TV channels such as entertainment or education. There is a fair amount of people encouraging children to watch TV both at home and at school because they think that youngsters can be more beneficial for watching TV. In my opinion, I do not encourage children to watch television regularly and this essay will argue my opinion.
On the one hand, I agree that children can gain knowledge by watching TV programs because organizations are likely to introduce online courses on TV or online channels. The content itself is pretty good, so students can obtain valuable information. For example, when my time was a student, I used to be beneficial from learning English in the BBC channel where contains numerous amazing English lesson that is published every day. This is a good example to support the opinion that children can learn via watching TV.
Despite children can be beneficial from watching TV, however, the idea that encouraging children to watch TV both at home and at school should not be accepted because of several reasons. The first one is there are several channels containing harmful content. Broadcasters nowadays find different ways to acquire and to attract more users. For example, crime news or sexual information is one of their tools to attract more audiences. In addition, watching TV frequently will affect negatively children development. When youngsters see negative content, they will tend to follow bad behaviors. Consequently, it will bring negative impacts on their development. Those are valid reasons to strongly support the option that children to watch TV regularly should not be encouraged.
In conclusion, this essay argued my opinion about not allowing children to watch TV both at school and at home. Although children can obtain knowledge from watching TV, I think parents should restrict and limit their children to watch TV instead of allowing them to watch with their freedom.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, however, if, so, for example, i think, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1663.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14860681115 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76058582409 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510835913313 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 489.6 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.982530557 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.8235294118 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.47058823529 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.486169589786 0.244688304435 199% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.161968903517 0.084324248473 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.166353052977 0.0667982634062 249% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.341802003183 0.151304729494 226% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0764407197418 0.056905535591 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.