In general, people think that travelling other countries should not be guided by a tour guide. They support that the guide's information is focused on what customers like. However, the notion does not reflect the stance that I hold and should not be thought about in a different light. I believe that it is the best way for people to travel in a group led by a tour guide. This is because they are unnecessary to their schedule and learn a lot of information from them.
First of all, people are not required to make their schedule for their travelling. To be specific, as modern society is becoming competitive, people have to do many tasks from their companies, which make them being stressful. Most people have a plan to travel other countries in order to relieve their cumulative stress. However, if they plan a schedule for themselves, it also is the task, even it is not from the companies. For example, when I went to Singapore for trip with my friend, I was very stressful. This was because my friend did not know everything about other countries and I had to plan our schedule. During the travelling, I and my friend conflicted my times about the schedule what I made. At that time, I thought that if we are with a tour guide, this situation was not occurred. Thus, this shows that traveling in a group led by a tour guide is the best way because it is not stressful.
Moreover, from the tour guide, people are able to lean a lot of information. In other word, even the Internet provides us much information, people could hardly find what they really want to find. However, the guides have experienced a lot of things such as cultural problems and communicative problems. It makes them to be used for those countries and they also solve problems immediately if they are facing with problems. For instance, I was a member of Samsung Electronics corporations. Our department had a trip to Malaysia. Nobody would not been there and eventually, we hired ten tour guides. It was very helpful for us because most of people in Malaysia could not speak well English and that places were not modernized and developed. They solved any problems they faced and it made us enjoying happy trip. As a result, this shows that the best way for people to travel is to be in a group led by a tour guide because people are able to learn a lot of information what we could not find in the Internet.
To sum up, I believe that it is the best way for people to travel in a group led by a tour guide. This is because people are unnecessary to plan their schedule without wasting time and learn a lot of information from the guide. Consequently, the importance of my views cannot be underestimated in that it can kill two birds with one stone for the reasons I have mentioned above. All in all, this trend will probably continue for the next generations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 634, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the people') or simply say ''most people''.
Suggestion: most of the people; most people
...des. It was very helpful for us because most of people in Malaysia could not speak well Englis...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'consequently', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'really', 'so', 'thus', 'well', 'for example', 'for instance', 'in general', 'such as', 'as a result', 'first of all', 'to sum up']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.203152364273 0.229887763892 88% => OK
Verbs: 0.183887915937 0.158761421928 116% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0577933450088 0.0866891130778 67% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0595446584939 0.046263068375 129% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0893169877408 0.0685040099705 130% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.133099824869 0.118717715034 112% => OK
Participles: 0.0402802101576 0.0351676179071 115% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.64285199867 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0332749562172 0.0309702414327 107% => OK
Particles: 0.00350262697023 0.00188951952338 185% => OK
Determiners: 0.0910683012259 0.0887237588012 103% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.015761821366 0.0209618222197 75% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0105078809107 0.0139019557991 76% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2849.0 2387.08602151 119% => OK
No of words: 514.0 408.028673835 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54280155642 5.86048508987 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.76146701107 4.48200974243 106% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.280155642023 0.338922669872 83% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.194552529183 0.251872472559 77% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.145914396887 0.174417080927 84% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.103112840467 0.112833075102 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64285199867 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.412451361868 0.524397521467 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 47.0490945693 59.2087087015 79% => OK
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6684587814 135% => OK
Sentence length: 18.3571428571 20.5533526081 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.8735695364 48.84282405 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.75 120.699889404 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3571428571 20.5533526081 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.607142857143 0.644075263715 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.54480286738 18% => OK
Readability: 37.8123957754 45.7405998639 83% => OK
Elegance: 1.13157894737 1.45489161554 78% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.33354601929 0.300154397459 111% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.121606118721 0.103427244359 118% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.11826268483 0.0752933317313 157% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.412821120029 0.497263757937 83% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.105904765947 0.151897553556 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126097310294 0.114077575197 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.147614467588 0.0781384742642 189% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.462130446876 0.336927656856 137% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0347514863512 0.067059652881 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.285004780709 0.210909579961 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0515173208697 0.0618886996521 83% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8870967742 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.86379928315 155% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.91756272401 224% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 9.0 8.42114695341 107% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 2.4623655914 203% => OK
Neutral topic words: 6.0 2.75985663082 217% => OK
Total topic words: 20.0 13.6433691756 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.