In general, people think that spending money on salaries university professors is important for students to improve the quality of education. They support that professors who get more salaries are likely to be motivated and improved their class quality. However, the notion does not reflect the stance that I hold and should not be thought about in a different light. I believe that universities should focus on other matters to improve the quality of education : building or improving the gym and collecting more various books in the library.
First of all, building or improving the gym makes students to improve the quality of education. To be specific, in today’s modern society, a great deal of technologies encourage student to enjoy themselves without exercising outside with others. Even it is beneficial partly, for students who have to study hard, negative side is bigger than positive side. In order to study hard, they have to improve and develop their bodies with exercise. Without this, students are easy to be tired and their efficiency is lower when they keep studying for a long time. For example, when I was a member of computer laboratory, I would not exercise, just only focus on project from an academic adviser. At that time, I did know that my body was damaged and tired and became tired easily. Eventually, I got lower grade what I expected because I had no exercised and my body was damaged for a long time. I thought that I would get better grade if I did exercise regularly. Thus, this proves that spending money on building or improving gym is better for students to improve the quality of education.
Moreover, for students, collecting more various books in the library would improve the quality of education. In addition, even today’s technologies provide student a lot of information, especially from the Internet, reading books is the best way to improve students’ education quality. However, most libraries are unlikely to purchase various and valuable books for the reasons that students are able to collect information from the Internet. For instance, when I was in university, I could not get any books what I want to read. This was because the university did not have various books. Thus, I have to purchase books by myself and it makes me more stressful during projects. As a result, universities should spend their money on collecting more various and valuable books in their libraries.
To sum up, I believe that spend money on salaries university professor is not the best way to improve the quality of education and they should build or improve the gym and collect more various and valuable books in the libraries. Consequently, the importance of my views cannot be underestimated in that it can kill two birds with one stone for the reasons I have mentioned above. All in all, this trend will probably continue for the next generations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 49, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'salaries'' or 'salary's'?
Suggestion: salaries'; salary's
...al, people think that spending money on salaries university professors is important for ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 42, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'salaries'' or 'salary's'?
Suggestion: salaries'; salary's
...o sum up, I believe that spend money on salaries university professor is not the best wa...
^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['consequently', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'so', 'thus', 'for example', 'for instance', 'in addition', 'in general', 'as a result', 'first of all', 'to sum up']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.213114754098 0.229887763892 93% => OK
Verbs: 0.183970856102 0.158761421928 116% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0728597449909 0.0866891130778 84% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0546448087432 0.046263068375 118% => OK
Pronouns: 0.063752276867 0.0685040099705 93% => OK
Prepositions: 0.12204007286 0.118717715034 103% => OK
Participles: 0.0382513661202 0.0351676179071 109% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.78335700255 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0327868852459 0.0309702414327 106% => OK
Particles: 0.00182149362477 0.00188951952338 96% => OK
Determiners: 0.0746812386157 0.0887237588012 84% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0200364298725 0.0209618222197 96% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0127504553734 0.0139019557991 92% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2896.0 2387.08602151 121% => OK
No of words: 485.0 408.028673835 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.97113402062 5.86048508987 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69283662038 4.48200974243 105% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.354639175258 0.338922669872 105% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.309278350515 0.251872472559 123% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.20618556701 0.174417080927 118% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.125773195876 0.112833075102 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78335700255 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.439175257732 0.524397521467 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 49.5044529521 59.2087087015 84% => OK
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6684587814 116% => OK
Sentence length: 20.2083333333 20.5533526081 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6410106105 48.84282405 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.666666667 120.699889404 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2083333333 20.5533526081 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.583333333333 0.644075263715 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.54480286738 36% => OK
Readability: 51.1361683849 45.7405998639 112% => OK
Elegance: 1.23493975904 1.45489161554 85% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.521890889036 0.300154397459 174% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.166000810132 0.103427244359 161% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.11331501829 0.0752933317313 150% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.453147628491 0.497263757937 91% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.130064121905 0.151897553556 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.181033284774 0.114077575197 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.144592935145 0.0781384742642 185% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.433733418703 0.336927656856 129% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0587970677824 0.067059652881 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.411032729424 0.210909579961 195% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0944824302384 0.0618886996521 153% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8870967742 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.86379928315 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.91756272401 81% => OK
Positive topic words: 14.0 8.42114695341 166% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 2.4623655914 81% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.75985663082 72% => OK
Total topic words: 18.0 13.6433691756 132% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.