How fast does progress in our lives depend on working quickly? Is the today's world so fast which enforces the people to risk making mistakes? What are important factors which determine how we should act to achieve maximum profits? How much do developed technology influence our social, economic, and industrial activities? Do advantages of working quickly even under conditions of probably making mistakes outweigh the disadvantages of that? There are several questions on this point. I can evaluate this topic in two domains including advantages working quick and risk making mistakes and advantages working slowly. My arguments for this matter are listed as follows.
Working quickly and risk making mistakes benefits from several advantages. First of all, with the development of science and technology, the information and required data have become easily available. For example, by means of internet, you can search all necessary information and find what you need to make decision faster that in the past. Secondly, there are many indexes to evaluate the cost and profits of a specific plan. By increasing evaluation aspects of a plan, outcomes can be predicted to some extent fast. Finally, working quickly and risk making mistakes is considered as an inseparable part of the successful people. As an illustration, the first plan of constructed computer was full of drawbacks and flaws; however, all of these problem have been removed over tens of years. Working quickly can create a turning point in a specific field of work.
On the other hand, working slowly and make sure that everything is correct consists of many advantages. In the first place, although the availability of required information has been increased, the complexity of making decision has been also risen. The number of aspects which should be regarded to make decision correctly is being increased, so more time is needed to evaluate all the important aspects. Second, the accuracy of the output data in a simulated system increases providing that the number of the parameters included in modeling system rises. Consequently, more time should be spent to include more effective parameters. Last but not least important is that working slowly and checking all aspects of a specific matter are followed by healthy life, both psychologically and physically.
According to the advantages of the working slowly, I believe that working slowly and make sure that everything is correct is preferable on account of the fact that some mistakes really destroy the cornerstone of a system, and it is better to prevent making mistakes.
- Do you agree or disagree? Rather than help children with their schoolwork, parents should encourage their children do their work independently. 70
- TPO-43 - Independent Writing Task Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away-Wa 60
- TPO-28 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Parents today are more involved in their children’s education than were parents in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- At some universities, students take part in making decisions about the issues that affect daily life of everyone on campus such as how many hours the libraries should be open each day or what kinds of food should be served in the cafeteria. But at some un 65
- You have long been friends with someone. If they do something that you don’t like, should you still be friends with him or her? 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 741, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this problem' or 'these problems'?
Suggestion: this problem; these problems
...of drawbacks and flaws; however, all of these problem have been removed over tens of years. W...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, however, if, really, second, secondly, so, for example, first of all, in the first place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2197.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 416.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28125 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51620172871 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81714257688 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521634615385 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 691.2 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1094766042 48.9658058833 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.5217391304 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0869565217 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4347826087 5.45110844103 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.371811074704 0.236089414692 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105277516263 0.076458572812 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.093899237263 0.0737576698707 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230990931837 0.150856017488 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.018635066052 0.0645574589148 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 58.1214874552 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 86.8835125448 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.