Success has different meanings for different people. For some being happy in life is the success, while for others being wealthy defines success. Nevertheless, the advice given by anyone on how to achieve success is the same, which is hard work. I also think that hard is important for success, but with a little bit of luck just to convert the dream into reality. In my opinion, luck is the smallest, but crucial, ingredient in completing the recipe of success.
To begin with, for me luck relates to the scenario of the world and this decides whether one would succeed or not. Consider the example of the founders of the Apple. Two people who completely turned the world around with the invention of the personal computer. This creation gave a person sitting in his home the power equivalent to that of an organization at that time because prior to that there were no personal computers and only businesses used them. For any invention to be such successful there has to be need or demand for that kind of thing. A countless number of inventions are done every year but only a few actually come to the market why? Because there is no urgent requirement of the inventions those failed. They might succeed in future, but not in present time.
Another good example is of the drones. Not long ago, drones were only the part of either military or some of the major companies such as Amazon as a part of their project. But now, according to a recent study, 4 million drones were solved to private customers previous year. Such a big change happened because of the requirement of these types of technologies. Nowadays, drones are used for various kinds of activities: self-photography, big monuments or buildings photography, automatic video recording, tracking activities and what not. Even the first developers of the drone wouldn’t have guessed such success of drones. Moreover, this definition of luck can be applied to human beings. Consider the case of the Hollywood actors, who wait for just one break or chance to act in a movie. How can an actor become so famous overnight with just one movie, while others spend their whole life working in different types of movies to get such fame? It’s not just the hard work, but some situational factors. Possibly, that particular movie plot would have suited the fresher and eventually helped him/her to express himself fully and justify that character. Furthermore, it is plausible that the actor did not perform that well but the storyline was good so everybody enjoyed it and the actor got famous.
In conclusion, I do not agree that luck does not play any part in success. Although hard work is the most important aspect while studying success, luck does play a role.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 307, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...rd is important for success, but with a little bit of luck just to convert the dream into ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 653, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... a few actually come to the market why? Because there is no urgent requirement of the i...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 743, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ntions those failed. They might succeed in future, but not in present time. Another go...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 860, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...so famous overnight with just one movie, while others spend their whole life work...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, furthermore, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, well, while, as to, in conclusion, kind of, such as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2269.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 468.0 407.700716846 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84829059829 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65116196802 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62123232494 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 256.0 212.727598566 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547008547009 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 706.5 618.680645161 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.2141464337 48.9658058833 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.037037037 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3333333333 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.7037037037 5.45110844103 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 11.8709677419 160% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204069645806 0.236089414692 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0530825243339 0.076458572812 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0470587917313 0.0737576698707 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132185213721 0.150856017488 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0367066443557 0.0645574589148 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 11.7677419355 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.55 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 86.8835125448 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.