TPO 27
Both the reading and speaking try to discuss about the cause of the Little Ice Age. Although the reading brings three ideas in order to explain the cause of Little Ice Age, the lecturer disagrees with them all and believes that all the ideas mentioned by reading are erroneous and defines three reason to reject them.
At first, the author asserts the theory that the ocean current probabely brought about the Little Ice Age. When the glaciers melted, they push the cold air from ocean to the land and this could affect the tempreture of the Earth. On the contrary, the speaker brings the reason that this idea is highly questionable due to the fact that the Little Ice Age included the other place such as Africa and Newziland and there was not any ocean current owing to melting of glaciers. So, the ocean current in this place was not able to result the Little Ice Age.
Furthermore, the reading argues that when one huge volcanic eroption occured, the vast emount of dark clouds were made and this clouds can plock the sunlight which in turn resulted the temperature decline and the Little Ice Age. Conversely, the professor refutes this claim due to the fact that if the significant volcanic erruption happend and the large clous were formed, there should be some reports about colorful sunset or brown snow. But there were no reports about anormaly in that time. Therefore, the volcanic eruption could not be the cause of this event.
Finally, the passage explains that according to the fact that people cut dowm the forests' trees in order to cultivate the crobs for food, the reduction of human population probabely was the cause of Little Ice Age. On the other hand, the lecturer dismisses this reason due to the concept that there was no enough time for population decline to be the cause of this event. The population was increased rapidly after readuction. Consequently, the readucing of the human population was not the cause of Little Ice Age.
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'consequently', 'conversely', 'finally', 'first', 'furthermore', 'if', 'so', 'therefore', 'such as', 'on the contrary', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.277929155313 0.261695866417 106% => OK
Verbs: 0.125340599455 0.158904122519 79% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0844686648501 0.0723426182421 117% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0354223433243 0.0435111971325 81% => OK
Pronouns: 0.00817438692098 0.0277247811725 29% => Some pronouns wanted.
Prepositions: 0.111716621253 0.128828473217 87% => OK
Participles: 0.0245231607629 0.0370669169778 66% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.2998787604 2.5805825403 89% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0326975476839 0.0208969081088 156% => OK
Particles: 0.00272479564033 0.00154638098197 176% => OK
Determiners: 0.174386920981 0.128158765124 136% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0108991825613 0.0158828679856 69% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00817438692098 0.0114777025283 71% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1957.0 1645.83664459 119% => OK
No of words: 339.0 271.125827815 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.77286135693 6.08160592843 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.04852973271 106% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.312684365782 0.374372842146 84% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.218289085546 0.287516216867 76% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.141592920354 0.187439937562 76% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0855457227139 0.113142543107 76% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.2998787604 2.5805825403 89% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477876106195 0.539623497131 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 48.8221748161 53.8517498576 91% => OK
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0529801325 107% => OK
Sentence length: 24.2142857143 21.7502111507 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.0414236035 49.3711431718 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.785714286 132.220823453 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2142857143 21.7502111507 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.857142857143 0.878197800319 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.39072847682 0% => OK
Readability: 46.0431942689 50.5018328374 91% => OK
Elegance: 2.45161290323 1.90840788429 128% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.669852353909 0.549887131256 122% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.206991352148 0.142949733639 145% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0903025424819 0.0787303798458 115% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.713326750419 0.631733273073 113% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.171789269182 0.139662658121 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.391760288898 0.266732575781 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125192555242 0.103435571967 121% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.564426789743 0.414875509568 136% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0208995109963 0.0530846634433 39% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.541422995001 0.40443939384 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0659019622008 0.0528353158467 125% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.26048565121 141% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 3.49668874172 86% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.62251655629 110% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 3.1766004415 126% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 10.2958057395 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.