These days, there is a controversial debate among people about the replacing large malls with small shops. There are a great number of people who interpret the impacts of this developing as thoroughly constructive, while others hold an opponent view. In this essay, I elucidate my point of view by analyzing both sides of the argument.
It is argued that providing large shopping malls in cities could tackle congested roads and decrease unemployment rate so this play a pivotal role in creating adroit people. This is attributed to the fact that such retail shopping complex could relieve the density of people in the street and buyers have a wider range of choices for affordable commodities, therefore, they would create a feeling of accomplishment and competence which consequently open avenues to new achievements so that buyers enthusiasm and determination will be amplified towards many daunting activities. Apple store, for example, establishing showrooms around the world would lead to decrease unemployment and foster well-being.
On the other hand, there are a number of people who hold a different view and say that it is claimed that some measures can be taken by governments to stimulate local people to purchase more goods from small shops and leaders of a country should stabilize economy and welfare of unprivileged region by expanding these shop centers, which would instill strong feeling of self-esteem in youngsters so that they are more likely to perform up to expectations in society. Specifically, a research study conducted by Yale University in 2015 has found that small shops could enhance a buyer’s intellectual ability to make decisions related to social and personal life.
In conclusion, this foregoing discussion propounds the view that although large shopping malls have enormous benefits for modern society, they can devastate the small shops. It is expected that governments take cognizance of this fact and they should adopt new planning regulations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 491, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'buyers'' or 'buyer's'?
Suggestion: buyers'; buyer's
...pen avenues to new achievements so that buyers enthusiasm and determination will be am...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, if, so, still, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 5.94088669951 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 26.0 20.9802955665 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1687.0 1207.87684729 140% => OK
No of words: 314.0 242.827586207 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37261146497 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 3.92707691288 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95501761288 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 139.433497537 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605095541401 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 379.143842365 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.6157635468 173% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.325123152709 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.5024630542 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 123.758191648 50.4703680194 245% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 168.7 104.977214359 161% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.4 20.9669160288 150% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9 7.25397266985 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232085515441 0.242375264174 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0984601670312 0.0925447433944 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103995368718 0.071462118173 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147514179476 0.151781067708 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0668537221815 0.0609392437508 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.6 12.6369458128 155% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 53.1260098522 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.46 11.5310837438 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.3 8.32886699507 124% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 55.0591133005 185% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.3980295567 138% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.