Over the past few decades, there has been a high degree of the ambivalence over this matter whether the government should build an advanced transport system or rather build new roads. This has elicited stimulated disputation among the public. Whereas some people say that the government should build new roads, I sanguinely believe rather the government should build an advanced transport system. This essay will further elaborate reasons to support this notion and then deduce a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are myriads of reasons to support this notion but one of the most compelling reason is that by building the advanced transport system the government can reduce the burden from the roads. nowadays most people would use their own car for traveling to the office as the public transport is not much reliable. This causes an excessive amount of traffic on the roads. hence, by building the advanced transport system the government can reduce the number of cars from the road.
On the contrary, there are some skeptics who conjecture that the situation can only be improved by building the new roads for the vehicles that overcrowding the cities as this will smooth the traffic movement in the city. Although it seems ostensibly veridical this is not the case, as even building the new road will not much help unless a large number of people start using the public transport system.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments from both the side, I profoundly believe that the benefits of improving the transport system far outweigh its drawbacks. Improving transport system not only reduce the traffic from the road it will also reduce the pollution caused by the more numbers of cars, hence government should focus on to build an advanced transport system.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 209, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Nowadays
...t can reduce the burden from the roads. nowadays most people would use their own car for...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 385, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Hence
...cessive amount of traffic on the roads. hence, by building the advanced transport sys...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 340, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... the new road will not much help unless a large number of people start using the public transport...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, so, then, whereas, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 6.10837438424 196% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 8.36945812808 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1505.0 1207.87684729 125% => OK
No of words: 295.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10169491525 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50078068822 2.71678728327 92% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.48813559322 0.580463131201 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 448.2 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.6327241828 50.4703680194 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.416666667 104.977214359 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5833333333 20.9669160288 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.91666666667 7.25397266985 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.369757755388 0.242375264174 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147465664012 0.0925447433944 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106102242759 0.071462118173 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.238521225556 0.151781067708 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0291222101455 0.0609392437508 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 12.6369458128 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 53.1260098522 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 11.5310837438 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.32886699507 96% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 55.0591133005 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.