Do you agree or disagree that we can ingnore the environment for the economic growth
In recent decades, China's economy has been undergoing a revival, which can be seen in the increasing GDP. However, our environment has been destroyed considered as the payment to the high speed growth. The river become more dirty with many kinds of pollutaints, less trees grow on the mountain, the air quality has decreased sharply. The fundamental of enhancing economy is providing enough substance for construction, consumption, and delivery. As a resault, the natual resouses are declining, the pollutants are pouring out to the river and atmosphere. It's a delamma to choose from protection of earth or high GDP.Then the question are raise that can we ignore the environment for the sake of economic growth? As far as I'm concerned, the answer is definitely no.
If we can view this problem in the long term, It's the environment should be put in the first place. There's only one earth that we can live on and have to leave it to our decendents. If we have used all the resorces, what can we leave to our children? How about children's children? There's no significant to the developed economy without substance to be used. We can imagine that they will live in the empty house eating the artificial food and breath the dirty air. Hence,we have to prevent human beings from this future from now on. We will be punished one day for regardless of the nature. For example, a small town in my hometown, they gained wealth by producting paper, they pour the abandoned red water into the river. Consequently, not only have the fish in the river disappeared, but also have their citizen's life been badly influenced. Althougt they have made money from creating the paper, they paid more in the future.
Furthermore, there's a solution so-called"green economy" , which means developing under the protection of our surounding. This method has combined the economic growth with the environmental prograss. It's possible for us to keep banlance of our two aims. There's many negative instances, in China, there are many buildings exist merely several years whereas the plan is many decades. The government will unboubtly spare many stuff if they build it in more techanical way. If we can change the plastic bag into the the fabric bag when we are shopping, this will also contribute to the protection. From my perspective, only if all of human beings implement the "green economy", can it be really achieved.
In conlusion, It's much wiser for us to consider about the environment before undertaking projects for economic growth.
Sentence: The river become more dirty with many kinds of pollutaints, less trees grow on the mountain, the air quality has decreased sharply.
Description: The fragment river become more is rare
Suggestion: Possible agreement error: Replace become with verb, present tense, 3rd person singular
Sentence: Then the question are raise that can we ignore the environment for the sake of economic growth?
Description: The fragment Then the question is not usually followed by are
Suggestion: Possible agreement error: Replace are with is
Sentence: There's no significant to the developed economy without substance to be used.
Description: An existential there is not usually followed by an article
Suggestion: Refer to There's and no
Sentence: If we can change the plastic bag into the the fabric bag when we are shopping, this will also contribute to the protection.
Description: The token the is not usually followed by an article
Suggestion: Refer to the and the
Sentence: The river become more dirty with many kinds of pollutaints, less trees grow on the mountain, the air quality has decreased sharply.
Error: pollutaints Suggestion: pollutant
Sentence: As a resault, the natual resouses are declining, the pollutants are pouring out to the river and atmosphere.
Error: natual Suggestion: natural
Error: resouses Suggestion: No alternate word
Error: resault Suggestion: result
Sentence: It's a delamma to choose from protection of earth or high GDP.Then the question are raise that can we ignore the environment for the sake of economic growth?
Error: delamma Suggestion: ?
Sentence: There's only one earth that we can live on and have to leave it to our decendents.
Error: decendents Suggestion: dependents
Sentence: If we have used all the resorces, what can we leave to our children?
Error: resorces Suggestion: resources
Sentence: For example, a small town in my hometown, they gained wealth by producting paper, they pour the abandoned red water into the river.
Error: producting Suggestion: No alternate word
Sentence: This method has combined the economic growth with the environmental prograss.
Error: prograss Suggestion: progress
Sentence: It's possible for us to keep banlance of our two aims.
Error: banlance Suggestion: balance
Sentence: The government will unboubtly spare many stuff if they build it in more techanical way.
Error: unboubtly Suggestion: No alternate word
Error: techanical Suggestion: technical
Sentence: In conlusion, It's much wiser for us to consider about the environment before undertaking projects for economic growth.
Error: conlusion Suggestion: confusion
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 13 2
Leave 5 minutes checking out spellings. The essay can get much higher marks without spelling errors.
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 24 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 13 2
No. of Sentences: 26 15
No. of Words: 427 350
No. of Characters: 2042 1500
No. of Different Words: 230 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.546 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.782 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.61 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 131 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 104 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 76 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 52 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 16.423 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.009 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.462 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.258 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.409 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.131 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5