The following appeared as part of a petition sent to residents of Youngtown by an environmental protection group:
“The Smith Corporation should not be permitted to develop the land that is now part of the Youngtown Wildlife Preserve. This sanctuary is essential to the survival of the 300 bird species that live in our area. Although only a small percentage of the land will be sold to Smith, the proposed development will have disastrous consequences for our area. The company plans to build a small hotel on the land. Although they have promised to ensure the preservation of the sanctuary, there is no way that their plans will do anything but harm the sanctuary. There are no circumstances under which this sale will benefit our community, which relies on tourists who visit primarily to see our magnificent bird population.”
Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are if the assumptions prove unwarranted.
I completely agree with the given statement that the permission to develop on the land which is the part of wildlife preserve. The author, here, states the probable consequences if any construction takes place over the sold piece of land. also, the author clarifies that they might not stick with what they are promising currently about preservation of the sanctuary. The author imagines what would it result if The smith corporation is allowed to do as per their plan.
From the authors point of view, constructing small hotel not only generates the physical building but also brings other aspects into effect. The hotel can be defined as the building built for the purpose of providing the service to stay or eat. In beginning, it might only be as per the plan however it might get modified with the flow of time. The smith corporation might analyze the intention of the person who visits the hotel. smith corporation might conclude that the numbe of visitors may grow if any entertainment source are included. Thus, the corporation might end up with the musical system; further with loud sound of music. this might be entertainment source for visitors but not for the habitats of the wildlife preserve.
The intention of smith corporation might be something like invasion; the hotel might be built within the purchased area of land but might use the area belonging to the wildlife preserve. this situation will lead to destruction of the habitat of animals and birds that used to stay to the location nearby hotel. this destruction will lead to decline in number of birds and animals. The hotel may not create the condition that suits the well living of the creates.
Almost all the consequences after allowing to build hotel are against the wildlife preserve as this with end up creating unfavourable living condition of the wildlives and then decline in number of wild creates. The purpose for which tourists visit will be no more the reason. Not only these mentioned effects are limited but there are huge numbers of other possible effects of building the hotel.
In final worlds, the construction of hotel will bring drastic change in the habitat of the wildlives over the time which will deteriote the surviving condition of wild animals as well as it might eradicate some of the species.
Comments
completely agree with the…
completely agree with the given statement that the permission to develop on the land which is the part of Wildlife Preserve. The author, here, states the probable consequences if any construction takes place over the sold piece of land. Also, the author clarifies that they might not stick with what they are promising currently about preservation of the sanctuary. The author imagines what would it result if The Smith Corporation is allowed to do as per their plan.
From the authors point of view, constructing small hotel not only generates the physical building but also brings other aspects into effect. The hotel can be defined as the building built for the purpose of providing the service to stay or eat. In beginning, it might only be as per the plan however it might get modified with the flow of time. The Smith corporation might analyze the intention of the person who visits the hotel. Smith corporation might conclude that the numbe of visitors may grow if any entertainment source are included. Thus, the corporation might end up with the musical system; further with loud sound of music. This might be entertainment source for visitors but not for the habitats of the Wildlife preserve.
The intention of Smith corporation might be something like invasion; the hotel might be built within the purchased area of land but might use the area belonging to the Wildlife preserve. This situation will lead to destruction of the habitat of animals and birds that used to stay to the location nearby hotel. This destruction will lead to decline in number of birds and animals. The hotel may not create the condition that suits the well living of the creates.
Almost all the consequences after allowing to build hotel are against the wildlife preserve as this with end up creating unfavourable living condition of the wildlives and then decline in number of wild creates. The purpose for which tourists visit will be no more the reason. Not only these mentioned effects are limited but there are huge numbers of other possible effects of building the hotel.
In final worlds, the construction of hotel will bring drastic change in the habitat of the wildlives over the time which will deteriote the surviving condition of wild animals as well as it might eradicate some of the species.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 240, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Also
...akes place over the sold piece of land. also, the author clarifies that they might n...
^^^^
Line 1, column 308, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...hat they might not stick with what they are promising currently about preservation of the san...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 434, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Smith
...ion of the person who visits the hotel. smith corporation might conclude that the num...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 639, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...stem; further with loud sound of music. this might be entertainment source for visit...
^^^^
Line 4, column 188, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...rea belonging to the wildlife preserve. this situation will lead to destruction of t...
^^^^
Line 4, column 312, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...d to stay to the location nearby hotel. this destruction will lead to decline in num...
^^^^
Line 5, column 44, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'building'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: building
...ost all the consequences after allowing to build hotel are against the wildlife preserve...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 207, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...d animals as well as it might eradicate some of the species.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, then, thus, well, after all, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.6327345309 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.9520958084 154% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 11.1786427146 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 13.6137724551 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 28.8173652695 62% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 55.5748502994 101% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 16.3942115768 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1914.0 2260.96107784 85% => OK
No of words: 389.0 441.139720559 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92030848329 5.12650576532 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.56307096286 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5836537087 2.78398813304 93% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 204.123752495 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.47557840617 0.468620217663 101% => OK
syllable_count: 587.7 705.55239521 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.96107784431 101% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.76447105788 126% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 19.7664670659 96% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.8473053892 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.132662714 57.8364921388 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.736842105 119.503703932 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4736842105 23.324526521 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.78947368421 5.70786347227 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.25449101796 152% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.20758483034 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 6.88822355289 44% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.67664670659 150% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122495113387 0.218282227539 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0422839068366 0.0743258471296 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0393326392028 0.0701772020484 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0681160409579 0.128457276422 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0398668432779 0.0628817314937 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 14.3799401198 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.3550499002 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.197005988 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.5979740519 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.32208582834 93% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 98.500998004 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 12.3882235529 89% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.1389221557 90% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.9071856287 84% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.