The following argument was made in a newspaper editorial:
“The autonomy of any country is based on the strength of its borders; if the number of illegal immigrants entering a country cannot be checked, both its economy and national identity are endangered. Because illegal immigrants pose such threats, every effort must be made to return them to their country of origin.”
I would like to think about that the Autonomy of the country is based on the strength of it's borders. People tend to say that the autonomy is just based on the economy and the position of every individual in the country. So let us discuss why I agree or disagree to the statement.
Firstly, I would like to start by saying that not all countries have illegal immigrants. So, we cannot include everyone under the list because people from different parts of world come to our country to pursue their goals, so that must not be taken under action like what happened in Syrian refugees.
Secondly , the author's point that allowing immigrants to stay in the country causes the country to become endangered and lose their national identity. Here as well I wanted to deliver the same thing , not all the immigrants causes trouble to the people over there. And nation loses it's identity not only because of the immigrants, there are various reason for them.
Lastly , the author cites that It causes the economy level to go down because which does not make sense to have been said like that. The economy of the country is purely based on the individuals and definitely not on the immigrants who enter the country. And there is no guarantee that if the immigrants are made to return to their country, the economy of the country increases. So, it is a fallacy statement.
Therefore , I wanted to conclude by saying not only the immigrants cause the country to be endangered and if they are pushed out ,the economy increases.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 9, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...happened in Syrian refugees. Secondly , the authors point that allowing immigra...
^^
Line 5, column 199, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... well I wanted to deliver the same thing , not all the immigrants causes trouble t...
^^
Line 7, column 7, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...e are various reason for them. Lastly , the author cites that It causes the eco...
^^
Line 9, column 10, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... it is a fallacy statement. Therefore , I wanted to conclude by saying not only...
^^
Line 9, column 129, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...be endangered and if they are pushed out ,the economy increases.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, therefore, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.6327345309 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.9520958084 31% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 11.1786427146 63% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 13.6137724551 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 28.8173652695 87% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 55.5748502994 77% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 16.3942115768 18% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1262.0 2260.96107784 56% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 267.0 441.139720559 61% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7265917603 5.12650576532 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.56307096286 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45415474359 2.78398813304 88% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 204.123752495 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52808988764 0.468620217663 113% => OK
syllable_count: 403.2 705.55239521 57% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.96107784431 101% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.471057884232 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.76447105788 57% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.22255489022 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 19.7664670659 66% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 22.8473053892 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7175947287 57.8364921388 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0769230769 119.503703932 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5384615385 23.324526521 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.70786347227 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.25449101796 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.20758483034 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 6.88822355289 87% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.67664670659 64% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285048458536 0.218282227539 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10350248627 0.0743258471296 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0827631842072 0.0701772020484 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153625354136 0.128457276422 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0389481565478 0.0628817314937 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 14.3799401198 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.3550499002 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.197005988 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 12.5979740519 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.32208582834 90% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 98.500998004 49% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 12.3882235529 89% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.1389221557 90% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.9071856287 84% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.