My car broke down yesterday, and I need a car to get to work. Therefore,
I should buy a new car.
The argument makes numerous unwarranted assumptions on the need to buy a new car which are not valid.
First, with the car having broken down, the argument insists on the need for another car to get to work. Instead, the car could have been repaired within the next day or other modes of transit such as a tram, bus, taxi etc. could be availed to reach the workplace. Hence, the argument must mention that the car could not be repaired within the following day. Also, the argument must make clear whether other modes of transit are not at the avail or the workplace is not connected directly by the transit modes.
Next, the argument proposes buying a new car as the solution for reaching the workplace with a repaired car. But, if at all the workplace could only reached by car, a car could be borrowed for a day from a colleague or a used car could be bought. Thus, the argument must make obvious that a no other car is not available to be borrowed and a used car is not preferred.
Finally, the argument primarily states the need to get to work the next day after the car break down. But, it does not give information on whether the current day was not a holiday. Therefore, the argument must state that the current day was a working day.
With the aforesaid unwarranted assumptions, the argument fails to provide valid reasons on the need to buy a new car.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, hence, if, so, therefore, thus, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.6327345309 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.9520958084 108% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 11.1786427146 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 13.6137724551 29% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 4.0 28.8173652695 14% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 55.5748502994 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 12.0 16.3942115768 73% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1125.0 2260.96107784 50% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 250.0 441.139720559 57% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.5 5.12650576532 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.56307096286 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40599584372 2.78398813304 86% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 204.123752495 56% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.456 0.468620217663 97% => OK
syllable_count: 342.9 705.55239521 49% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59920159681 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.96107784431 20% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.471057884232 0% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.76447105788 126% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 19.7664670659 66% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.8473053892 83% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.3482905148 57.8364921388 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.5384615385 119.503703932 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2307692308 23.324526521 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.07692307692 5.70786347227 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.25449101796 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.20758483034 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 6.88822355289 116% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.67664670659 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.382360312358 0.218282227539 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.170214155901 0.0743258471296 229% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126434449071 0.0701772020484 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.247266697274 0.128457276422 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0481580883933 0.0628817314937 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 14.3799401198 65% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 48.3550499002 143% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 12.197005988 68% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.82 12.5979740519 70% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.32208582834 89% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 98.500998004 46% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 12.3882235529 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.1389221557 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.