Photographers who work in color have an advantage over those who work in black-and-white.
The Argument that color photographers have an advantage over Black-and-white photographers is flawed. Because the conclusion is drawn from the assumption that magazines, studios and newspapers represent the whole market which is unwarranted and that it is also drawn from vague and ambiguous terms like Successful, most etc. Furthermore, the author considered only the demand of color and black- and- white photographers only, but neglected the supply of photographers in drawing the conclusion.
First assumption is that the magazines, newspapers and studios represents the entire market which is not true, for there are other publishers like books, posters etc. which also use photographs. And there is no information regarding the usage of color and Black-and-white photographs in these areas. In these areas, there can be more usage of Black-and-white photographs than color photographs which weakens the argument.
Secondly, author drawn conclusion based on vague and ambiguous terms such as successful, many, most, more. There is no information about what successful means. It can be Artistic or commercial success. And Artistic success can come from usage of black-and-white photographs rather than color photographs. Another term is many, for example take 10 newspapers, let many means 7, what about the remaining 3 newspapers? These can be popular ones and if popularity was gained by using black-and-white photographs, then they tend to use only them in future which weakens the argument.
Third assumption is that there is no competition in color photography jobs. What if many people are competing for color photography jobs and there is only few competitors for the black-and-white, then black-and-white photographers have an advantage than the color photographers.
This argument could be strengthened if the information about the supply of color and black-and-white photographers. And it could be further strengthened if he clearly defined those vague terms and he provided information about the usage of photographs in publishers other than those three. However, in current form, argument is flawed for the reasons indicated above.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, third, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.6327345309 107% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.9520958084 46% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 11.1786427146 224% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 10.0 13.6137724551 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 28.8173652695 62% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 55.5748502994 52% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 13.0 16.3942115768 79% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1829.0 2260.96107784 81% => OK
No of words: 325.0 441.139720559 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62769230769 5.12650576532 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.56307096286 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36415353307 2.78398813304 121% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 204.123752495 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.473846153846 0.468620217663 101% => OK
syllable_count: 552.6 705.55239521 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.96107784431 60% => OK
Article: 2.0 8.76447105788 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.67365269461 239% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 19.7664670659 91% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.8473053892 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.1788271243 57.8364921388 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.611111111 119.503703932 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0555555556 23.324526521 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11111111111 5.70786347227 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.25449101796 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.20758483034 122% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 6.88822355289 87% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256149751395 0.218282227539 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0963086059106 0.0743258471296 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122232862456 0.0701772020484 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171796715403 0.128457276422 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0763554238033 0.0628817314937 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.3799401198 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.3550499002 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.197005988 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 12.5979740519 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.32208582834 98% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 98.500998004 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 12.3882235529 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.1389221557 83% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.9071856287 126% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.