23. Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
It is the job of the government to ensure that an environment of peace and tranquality is maintained in the area under it's governence. For this purpose, government makes rules and restrictions that are supposed to be followed by everyone, be it a big cooperation or an individual. Government places similar restrictions on the organizations undertaking scientific research and development. The claim presented states that these restrictions should be minimized, if not completely abolished.
It is true that any kind of scientific research will flourish if there are no restrictions placed on the one undertaking that research. Without any restrictions, the person's imagination is free to explore all the possible solutions to any problem he/she faces. For example, without any restrictions, a person doing a research on the cure of a disease is free to experiment with any disease he/she considers appropriate. This opens a plethora of options for the researcher, any of which could be taken.
Form the example above, it seems that there is no need for government to place any kind of rules and regulations on scientific research and development. However, this is not true. Suppose one of the possible cure for the disease in the example above has deadly side-effects, then it becomes the duty of the government to put a restriction on the testing of that drug on humans.
There are other scenarios where the restrictions placed by government on scientific research can be aptly justified. Government needs to place restrictions on the research on any such technology which can be dangerous in the hands of general public. Research on technologies like nuclear weapons, arms and ammunition, etc are not something that can be taken up by any random individual. In such scenarios, government restriction on their research makes
In conclusion, I do not fully agree with the given recommendation. Yes, an absence of restrictions may help increase the pace of research and help us discover new domains but these restrictions are there to ensure the safety and security of every individual. In my opinion, the cost of revmoving restrictions is not worth the price.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 167, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...research. Without any restrictions, the persons imagination is free to explore all the ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 316, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
...ithout any restrictions, a person doing a research on the cure of a disease is free to exp...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 235, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
... which can be dangerous in the hands of general public. Research on technologies like nuclear ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 453, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ment restriction on their research makes In conclusion, I do not fully agree with...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, then, for example, in conclusion, kind of, in my opinion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1823.0 2235.4752809 82% => OK
No of words: 350.0 442.535393258 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20857142857 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22123185969 2.79657885939 115% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 215.323595506 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.48 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 574.2 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.326436159 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.235294118 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5882352941 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.58823529412 5.21951772744 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20730121527 0.243740707755 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0790859722084 0.0831039109588 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0585663812112 0.0758088955206 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121097574366 0.150359130593 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0264189153729 0.0667264976115 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 14.1392134831 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 100.480337079 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.