All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
The question of balance between absorbing internal and external advice for the growth of business company has received increased attention in the recent decades. Take the question at hand, the necessity and effect of hiring of consultants from outside the company in order to assist the operation of the company are under great scrutiny. While some people may suggest that listening to the company's own staff, who presumably are more familiar with the operation of their company, can fully waive the need of hiring outside consultants, I believe the outside specialties can nonetheless become greatly helpful for the company in multiple ways that employees of the company can not provide, and it can be supported by several reasons as follows. First and foremost, consultants are specialties whose work fully focus on facilitating companies in certain fields to achieve perform smooth operations and scientifically growing. Typically, they spend tons of time learning about the trend of the business and the tendency of various companies in the same field, and studying on the experience and success of their operations, while employees of one company are required to prioritize their own daily work and have limited time on exploring the fad of the industry. For example, consultants who work with those newly emerged private companies might have accumulated numerous experience about how to operate the budding company to obtain large amount investment from the investors, while the employees in the new company are most interns and recently started young staff with barely any knowledge of the operation of the company and the rules of the business. In that case, hiring professional consultants from consultation service would definitely be a smarter move for the company. Furthermore, it is undeniable that employees who spend all of their time working inside the company are the group of people who know about the details of the company, such as functions of the departments, cooperation pattern between different project groups and of course, the advantage and disadvantage of their own company. However, it doesn't necessarily mean that the consultants would be utterly unnecessary. On the contrary, the employees can communicate with the consultants to help them understand the muscle and bones of a company in a short amount of time and assist them to develop a better plan for the company's operation and long-term growth. There is no, and should be no boundary between listening to employees and hiring outside consultants. In fact, for the operators of the company, it is wise to spend more time to hearing from their own person, while still receive the help from outside. In a nutshell, although listening to the employees are a basic requirement for the leaders of the company for a smoother and more efficient operation of their company, the help from outside consultants cannot be totally ignored. As mentioned, consultants are specialties with profound knowledge of the industry and are capable to provide opinion from a objective perspective of view, which are unique advantages that employees cannot provide. Take all into consideration, I suggest that companies should hire consultant while still spending enough time to listening from their employees, in order to better operate the company and achieve a future success.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 2116, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ntage of their own company. However, it doesnt necessarily mean that the consultants w...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 3036, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...and are capable to provide opinion from a objective perspective of view, which ar...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, may, nonetheless, so, still, while, for example, in fact, of course, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 90.0 58.6224719101 154% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2809.0 2235.4752809 126% => OK
No of words: 532.0 442.535393258 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28007518797 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80261649409 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84673298996 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 215.323595506 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.458646616541 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 890.1 704.065955056 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 23.0359550562 152% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 97.4237935802 60.3974514979 161% => OK
Chars per sentence: 187.266666667 118.986275619 157% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.4666666667 23.4991977007 151% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4 5.21951772744 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.97078651685 20% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.522427326101 0.243740707755 214% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.191453376346 0.0831039109588 230% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0846048043921 0.0758088955206 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.522427326101 0.150359130593 347% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667264976115 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.2 14.1392134831 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.49 48.8420337079 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.1 12.1743820225 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.94 12.1639044944 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 100.480337079 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.8971910112 155% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 11.2143820225 143% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.7820224719 161% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.