Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.

Moral judgement among the people is critical to the civilized working of a society. This sound judgement sometimes causes hatred towards the leader especially if the accused peers are rich or have considerable following. Sound moral judgement, no matter what the results are, should be carried out even if the respect of the leader from his or her peers weakens.

Celebrities in many interviews say that the hate they receive from people is much less as compared to the love. This simply states the fact that leaders may receive hate if they take judgments against the accused but the respect and love the leaders attain will always be much greater than the hate. Thus, the leader will attract the best people in the society who promote justice, love and respect. These people are usually the ones who drastically improve the overall conditions of a certain country or state by opening healthy businesses, education promoting equality in all aspects such as gender, color, religion, etc.

Oppressors become strong in their evil acts if no or little action is taken against them which also motivates more people to commit crimes. However, if these people are given proper corporal punishments for their crimes, be it small or heinous, the society's crime rates drop down and peace entails. Taking sound judgement does not degrade the respect of the leader from the majority. For certain time periods, the criminals might dislike the leader but after completing their probations, these robbers actually start to like the leader for his or her wisdom. Thus, when they come out of jail they are civilized persons most often wanting to contribute towards the society.

Truth hurts when sometimes spoken but in the end instead of hatred, truth is the winner. Sound moral judgement depends very much on speaking the truth which is on of the characters of successful leaders. Moral judgement is important for an effective leader no matter the consequences. His or her respect might weaken for certain time but in the future it definitely strengthens.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 88, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...e they receive from people is much less as compared to the love. This simply state...
^^
Line 9, column 48, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...ors become strong in their evil acts if no or little action is taken against them ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, however, if, may, so, then, thus, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 58.6224719101 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1719.0 2235.4752809 77% => OK
No of words: 338.0 442.535393258 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08579881657 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47151943529 2.79657885939 88% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 215.323595506 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.562130177515 0.4932671777 114% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 704.065955056 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6801068552 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.4375 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.125 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.875 5.21951772744 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204433305988 0.243740707755 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0707377195931 0.0831039109588 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0686985732838 0.0758088955206 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12919594641 0.150359130593 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0490193439082 0.0667264976115 73% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 100.480337079 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.


Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.