In any field — business, politics, education, government — those in power should be required to step down after five years.
The author states that people in powerful position should be required to step down after 5 years of service as he/she believes based on various assumptions that after 5 years in power, people will not bring the impact they are supposed to bring or simply should not be allowed: to provide a way for younger generation to lead. However, this argument if scrutinize further with real world evidences will fall apart. In my opinion, people must be allowed to hold powerful position for extended period of time, provided they regain their position with fair means like elections, panel discussions, public opinion etc.
Working for more than 5 years in a decision-making position allow people to make long term decisions. For example, Satya Nadella at microsoft recently gave up the microsoft mobile platform and announced to collaborate and bring their cloud services to other platforms. The impact of this decision cannot be measured in short period of time because this will impact microsoft in a long run as the number of devices running on these platforms will receive the same office products that were earlier tied exclusively with microsoft platform.Also having a long-term stability in power instill responsibility in leaders as they become aware that if something goes wrong, they will have to deal with it in future hence they take their decisions cautiously.
The experience these leaders gain from working at powerful positions for long term allows them to navigate through previously experienced problem with better accuracy to fix and succeed. they can also use experience to avoid typical problems using foresight they gain while working at their positions previously. For example, the education field always have to prepare their students for industry work. A new leader might not be able to network through companies efficiently or will not be able to judge the market demand and fluctuations. However, an experienced leader in education sector will have a better network with alumni and people with whom he has worked earlier, these people certainly will provide him the right network and industry perspective over current market demands.
Nevertheless, it also can be argued that some may exert monopoly if allowed to keep hold of power for longer period of time or may not be able to bring fresh perspective or may tends to misuse their power but, an audit or accountability system in place can keep in check on these leaders and if guilt found or mischievous intention detected these systems can replace/remove such leaders. For example, the congress in parliament keeps the decisions of president in check and sometimes even do not approve certain decisions which does not work in favor of people.
In conclusion, the change in leadership just after 5 years in any field would result to the loss of expertise and experience that can be detrimental for the field. Therefore, it is recommended that the leader must be allowed to continue for extended period of time with account and audit system in place to keep their accountability on check.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-23 | jason123 | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-21 | meghanajilla | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-08 | er.vprashant | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-03 | hj84 | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-03 | hj84 | 16 | view |
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In deve 66
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities. 66
- In any field — business, politics, education, government — those in power should be required to step down after five years. 83
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts.Write a response in which you 83
- It is more harmful to compromise one's own beliefs than to adhere to them.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In d 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 493, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... to hold powerful position for extended period of time, provided they regain their position wi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 326, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...is decision cannot be measured in short period of time because this will impact microsoft in a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 539, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Also
...ied exclusively with microsoft platform.Also having a long-term stability in power i...
^^^^
Line 3, column 539, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...ied exclusively with microsoft platform.Also having a long-term stability in power i...
^^^^
Line 5, column 188, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...ith better accuracy to fix and succeed. they can also use experience to avoid typica...
^^^^
Line 5, column 526, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t be able to judge the market demand and fluctuations. However, an experienced le...
^^
Line 7, column 110, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...llowed to keep hold of power for longer period of time or may not be able to bring fresh persp...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 252, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ust be allowed to continue for extended period of time with account and audit system in place ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, in short, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 23.0 12.4196629213 185% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 76.0 58.6224719101 130% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2575.0 2235.4752809 115% => OK
No of words: 502.0 442.535393258 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12948207171 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7334296765 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7254759939 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 258.0 215.323595506 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513944223108 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 796.5 704.065955056 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 23.0359550562 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 109.583372624 60.3974514979 181% => OK
Chars per sentence: 171.666666667 118.986275619 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.4666666667 23.4991977007 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 5.21951772744 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125583568859 0.243740707755 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0461027125791 0.0831039109588 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.066179869465 0.0758088955206 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0836876417711 0.150359130593 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0593001687878 0.0667264976115 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.5 14.1392134831 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.98 48.8420337079 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 12.1743820225 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.07 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 100.480337079 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.8971910112 147% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 11.2143820225 136% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.