In any situation, progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting points of view.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
We are living in a world that many unions and corporations have been established to assess different ideas and make the best decision to solve the problems, and also this prompt suggests that taking into account of any viewpoints would be required, in any circumstances, to progress. Although some people may support this idea, I mostly disagree with this recommendation because of two specific reasons.
To begin with, considering all of the contradictions among attitudes is time-consuming and this world is changing too fast. For instance, imagine that there would be a heavy rain fall in a local village and the members in the organization of crisis management have to decide weather transfer the people or make some temporary shelters, and since this issue is unprecedented in this village there are not any determined and clear guidelines to take a proper action. Now, the members have to discuss about it in meanwhile the rain is pouring and make worse condition of paths to transfer people or help them. As a result of being indecisive, assessing all the contradictions in attitudes, they may lose the time and the rate of the casualties might increase. I mean that, not in any situation, examining all opinions are not necessary since it is time consuming and also make to lose our concentration from the core of the problems. Thus, an utter decision or checking a few opinions in critical situations is the most important part of solving problems to advance.
Moreover, not any people are qualified to state their opinions in any situations that are not expert in. As a clear example, the COVID-19 vaccine has been made almost one year ago and we still hear about people who avoiding to inject it with a biased idea that 'MY BODY, MY DECISION". So why the governments in around the world are laying dawn many laws to deal with the opponents of vaccine and not examining their attitudes? Do all the opponents have enough information about the process of making the vaccine or state their attitude based only on some stereotypes not on the reality. In response, this is my idea that some situations are not solving through assessing any personal and narrow-minded opinions, and in this specific case, the result of considering all the opinions would be led to surging the rate of death and continuing economic crisis. In fact, to decrease the rate of conflicts as a result of contrasting opinions, it may be pragmatic to consider expert's opinion and be straightforward and clear in announcement of new laws.
In conclusion, Some may believe that through assessing any various aspects of an issue, they can reach out the big picture of every problems and solve it effectively, however, as I have mentioned before, this belief is not practical in a situation that we need to make the best decision immediately. Moreover,some problems are unique to progress and the people can not overcome it by myopic and lack of knowledge views. These problems require clear and categorical laws, set down by pundits' disinterested and professional point of views.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 28, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ic reasons. To begin with, considering all of the contradictions among attitudes is time-...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 215, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'avoiding injecting'.
Suggestion: avoiding injecting
... ago and we still hear about people who avoiding to inject it with a biased idea that MY BODY, MY ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 452, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g their attitudes? Do all the opponents have enough information about the proces...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...nd clear in announcement of new laws. In conclusion, Some may believe that throu...
^^
Line 4, column 309, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , some
... the best decision immediately. Moreover,some problems are unique to progress and the...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 539, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rested and professional point of views.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, thus, while, for instance, i mean, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 14.8657303371 175% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 80.0 58.6224719101 136% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2550.0 2235.4752809 114% => OK
No of words: 514.0 442.535393258 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96108949416 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.76146701107 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94055062083 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 253.0 215.323595506 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.492217898833 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 817.2 704.065955056 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 23.0359550562 130% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.8654361068 60.3974514979 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.0 118.986275619 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.2352941176 23.4991977007 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.64705882353 5.21951772744 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124840560408 0.243740707755 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0429079086356 0.0831039109588 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0262115559983 0.0758088955206 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0800820851273 0.150359130593 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00863908111737 0.0667264976115 13% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 14.1392134831 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 48.8420337079 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 12.1743820225 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.08 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 100.480337079 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 11.2143820225 125% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.