astro
Both the reading and the lecture discess wether it is convenient to have colonies in the asteroid or not. The former argues that it is easy and profitable to have colonies in the asteroid but the later disprove all the argument given by the reading.
First of all , the author contends that low gravity of the astoroid will make it easier to the spaceship for landing and a lot of equipement can easily be carried to the asteroid from the earth. In contrast, the lecturer argues that low gravity will creats loosing in muscles as well as the calcium density in the boon statrs to decrease. He also adds that even a astronuts stay only for few months in the asteroid it will make a huge damage to his health.
Secondly, the reading asserts that, the asterios are full of precious metals and it will be a great ways to income a lot of money by making buisness of these metals in the earth. However, the professors rebuts that considering the cost of mining and transfering the metals to the earth it may not be very benificial. In addition, if the amount of the metals increase the price can be drcease and it will make them less profitable then it was think before.
Finally, the text claims that, since some of the asretoids often visite very close to the earth it is easy and cheap to have colony to them and get back to the earth. On the other hands, the lecture counters that, although some asteriod come very close to the earth their orbitals are not organized like the other planets so they also visite too far that make it become more challenging to return back to the earth. He further argues that, the asteroids doesn't stay close to the earth and travel such a distance that made it very costly to return back.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 13, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...nt given by the reading. First of all , the author contends that low gravity of...
^^
Line 3, column 363, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...trs to decrease. He also adds that even a astronuts stay only for few months in t...
^
Line 3, column 429, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'huge damage'.
Suggestion: huge damage
...few months in the asteroid it will make a huge damage to his health. Secondly, the reading...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 101, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'way'?
Suggestion: way
... precious metals and it will be a great ways to income a lot of money by making buis...
^^^^
Line 5, column 431, Rule ID: LESS_MORE_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'?
Suggestion: than
...e and it will make them less profitable then it was think before. Finally, the te...
^^^^
Line 5, column 443, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'thought'.
Suggestion: thought
...l make them less profitable then it was think before. Finally, the text claims tha...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 38, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... Finally, the text claims that, since some of the asretoids often visite very close to th...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 388, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'returning'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: returning
...ar that make it become more challenging to return back to the earth. He further argues th...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 391, Rule ID: RETURN_BACK[1]
Message: Use simply 'return'.
Suggestion: return
...that make it become more challenging to return back to the earth. He further argues that, t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 455, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
.... He further argues that, the asteroids doesnt stay close to the earth and travel such...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 541, Rule ID: RETURN_BACK[1]
Message: Use simply 'return'.
Suggestion: return
... a distance that made it very costly to return back.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, well, in addition, in contrast, as well as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1412.0 2235.4752809 63% => OK
No of words: 315.0 442.535393258 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.48253968254 5.05705443957 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27219597292 2.79657885939 81% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 215.323595506 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.504761904762 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 704.065955056 63% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.2370786517 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 38.1694785255 60.3974514979 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.363636364 118.986275619 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.6363636364 23.4991977007 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.4545454545 5.21951772744 258% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 7.80617977528 141% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.243740707755 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0831039109588 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0758088955206 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.150359130593 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667264976115 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 48.8420337079 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 12.1743820225 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.3 12.1639044944 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 100.480337079 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.