The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of co operation not competition.
However, many of us think co operation is the key for success. I completely disagree with the given statement. I believe that to achieve an accomplishment in any field whether it is personal or group task, there should be feeling of doing better than others. Therefore, competition is crucial for any endeavors to obtain great outcomes. Moreover, the culture of competition should be cultivated from early ages so that they can be more innovative to perform work for efficient results by their unique leadership.
To develop efficient leadership, one should go through extensive learning and must have determination to lead the work what he or she is dedicated for. We can take an example of a country South Korea that rises from the rubble mass to a developed nation. This is possible only because of feeling of competition. This competition was started while the government initiated Semaeul On Dong projects throughout the country. In this project villages were given resources to construct simple bridges, roads and so on. And at last the performance was analyzed on the basis of their performance and utilization of resources provided. The best performers were awarded and disregarde the poorer ones. By this strategy government was able to produce more best performers. Hence, competition makes an individual more creative, rational and efficient leader.
For the betterment of society the production of good leaders is important and that can be done by nuturing them from young period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 741, Rule ID: MOST_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use only 'best' (without 'more') when you use the superlative.
Suggestion: best
...strategy government was able to produce more best performers. Hence, competition makes an...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 741, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'more the best'.
Suggestion: more the best
...strategy government was able to produce more best performers. Hence, competition makes an...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, moreover, so, therefore, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 58.6224719101 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1256.0 2235.4752809 56% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 241.0 442.535393258 54% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21161825726 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 4.55969084622 86% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92832604128 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 215.323595506 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.643153526971 0.4932671777 130% => OK
syllable_count: 395.1 704.065955056 56% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.2787696507 60.3974514979 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.7333333333 118.986275619 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0666666667 23.4991977007 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.06666666667 5.21951772744 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.97078651685 60% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155951318916 0.243740707755 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0476279930573 0.0831039109588 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0546255448885 0.0758088955206 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120115527041 0.150359130593 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0440509315008 0.0667264976115 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.8420337079 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.38706741573 112% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 100.480337079 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.