The best way to solve environmental problems caused by consumer-generated waste is for towns and cities to impose strict limits on the amount of trash they will accept from each household.
The environmental problems is serious in many towns and cities. How to deal with the large amount of consumer-generated waste bother many policy makers. Some suggest that the best solution is for towns and cities to impose strict limits on the amount of trash they will accept from each household. However, in my opinion, this suggestion has some flaws and is not plausible.
First of all, we should note that most of the consumer-generated waste does not come from but from other specific occupation. For example, the restaurants would generate a lot of waste of food every day, they discard all of the food which wasn’t sold in that day. On the contrary, in household, the food would be kept even it was not finished at once. The household actually generates a small proportion of consumer-generated waste. Thus, it is improper to focus the policy on household.
In addition, the strict policy might not really decrease the waste. The refuse to accept excessive waste from the government does not indicate that the household would generate less trash. Possibly, some households may discard excessive trash in the forest and harm the nature ecology. Others may bury it at some secret place and pollute the land .Still the other might even burn it, thus cause the air pollution. If the waste could not be handled properly, the situation will become worse.
Alternatively, I believe that there are a lot of better way to deal with this environmental problem. For example, the government should not strict the amount of trash they would accept, but encourage the household to produce less waste. If the amount of waste is under the threshold, the household should be receive some reward. In addition, the government can also put the tax on the waste, that is, the more waste, the more charge. This may deter the household from generate too much waste. Furthermore, some policy should focus on specific occupations like the bakery and the restaurants. Their production should be regularized, namely, they should be punished if they make too much products and cause the waste. All of those suggestion are beneficial to the environment and are more efficiency than the statement actually.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The environmental problems is serious in...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...has some flaws and is not plausible. First of all, we should note that most o...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 223, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...f waste of food every day, they discard all of the food which wasn't sold in that day...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er to focus the policy on household. In addition, the strict policy might not...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 352, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...t some secret place and pollute the land .Still the other might even burn it, thus...
^^
Line 5, column 354, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Still
...some secret place and pollute the land .Still the other might even burn it, thus caus...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 354, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Still,
...some secret place and pollute the land .Still the other might even burn it, thus caus...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y, the situation will become worse. Alternatively, I believe that there are ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 314, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'received'?
Suggestion: received
... the threshold, the household should be receive some reward. In addition, the governmen...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 687, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...hey should be punished if they make too much products and cause the waste. All of th...
^^^^
Line 7, column 729, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this suggestion' or 'those suggestions'?
Suggestion: this suggestion; those suggestions
...ch products and cause the waste. All of those suggestion are beneficial to the environment and a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, really, so, still, thus, for example, in addition, first of all, in my opinion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1835.0 2235.4752809 82% => OK
No of words: 365.0 442.535393258 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02739726027 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37092360658 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82549845979 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 215.323595506 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.484931506849 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 570.6 704.065955056 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 12.0 4.99550561798 240% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.6023673836 60.3974514979 44% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 83.4090909091 118.986275619 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5909090909 23.4991977007 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.21951772744 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 7.80617977528 141% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 5.13820224719 253% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.411023632204 0.243740707755 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111136681491 0.0831039109588 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124280787712 0.0758088955206 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.260694637046 0.150359130593 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.126453158775 0.0667264976115 190% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 14.1392134831 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.8420337079 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.38706741573 88% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 100.480337079 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.