The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Ignoring negative actions and praising positives ones is not the best way to teach people. When people think about their undesirable actions’ consequences, they are able to become more realistic individuals. Talking about undesirable actions should be in appropriate ways to make sure that there are no hard feelings.
It will teach one to become a better person when one understands one’s mistakes resulted by those negative actions. For instance, a couple who never talks about their negative actions, such as not being clean enough, may face problems in the future. As a result, they may end up having a large disagreement with one another instead of working to improve their relationship. Therefore, communication is a key in every relationship. If couples only mention their positive activities, there may be no improvements in their relationships. On the other hand, a wife can communicate kindly with her husband in case of something that she does not appreciate. For example, when her husband enters the house with his dirty shoes on, she may ask him kindly to remove them.
Additionally, talking about negative actions with positive language can encourage children to learn more. Consider a child who never cleans her room and the child’s parents never mention about organizing her belongings. Consequently, this child may never be an organized person. As an opposite example, a child who always cleans her room because her mother has already discussed about being clean.
On the contrary, some people may believe that the best way to teach others is to ignore undesirable behavior and to mention only positive actions. It can be true in some specific situations. For instance, a mother should not blame her child if a child breaks a glass accidently because it can hurt the child’s feelings. However, the mother can kindly remind her child to be more careful while she does not hurt her child’s emotions. In the meantime, the mother can mention her child about her positive actions such as helping in cooking which is beneficial to make the child more confidence.
It is advantageous to have discussions about individuals’ negative actions in an appropriate way to improve their attitudes because only complimenting positive action is not sufficient to help people to understand well.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 76, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an appropriate way" with adverb for "appropriate"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ons about individuals’ negative actions in an appropriate way to improve their attitudes because only...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, however, if, may, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, such as, talking about, as a result, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 14.8657303371 20% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1938.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 373.0 442.535393258 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19571045576 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89386562172 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 215.323595506 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.495978552279 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 608.4 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.0894526786 60.3974514979 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.9 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.65 23.4991977007 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.9 5.21951772744 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155772000227 0.243740707755 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.062241696429 0.0831039109588 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0833137480295 0.0758088955206 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107688981813 0.150359130593 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0442301849654 0.0667264976115 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 100.480337079 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.