Claim: In any field — business, politics, education, government — those in power should step down after five years.
Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
This topic raises the controversial issue of whether changing leadership every five years is the key to successful enterprise. Indisputably, replacing the leader in any private or public company is bringing the company to novel and refreshing approaches and ways to collaborate and bring to meaningful changes. Nevertheless, replacing leadership every five years might lead to adverse effects on any enterprise’s development and productivity. Thus, I generally disagree with the opinion that leadership should be switched in such a short time, and would argue that for leaders to have true long-term impact, they should stay for longer periods.
First, for meaningful and successful change to happen, every leader must have a “critical” amount of time. This critical time might vary depends on the nature of each company, expectations and requirements. When dealing with influential enterprises such us politics or education, time becomes the worse enemy for leaders who seek to make a difference. Leaders need time, to comprehend the convoluted system, its meaning and its future goals. Sometimes, it take months if not years to be able to build a solid and valuable plan for the upcoming years, needless to mention, to implement.
Furthermore, it is much harder to deduce about the long-term consequences, when leadership changes often. With every new leadership comes a different style of managing, of coping with issues and sometimes a completely new emphasis on how the company should work. For instance, when Donald Trump stepped in, the whole environment of the country and focus on the essential topics has shifted, and many of the previous decisions made by Barack Obama, were changed or put on hold. Today, for example, it is still difficult to estimate if the Obama Care helped or not. Therefore, especially when dealing with nation wise issues, there is a remarkable value of time to apprehend the extent of each considered transformation.
Admittedly, one might say that having people in power for long periods is highly risky and might be dangerous, especially in governmental and educational systems, where irreversible decisions might have unfortunate affects for next generations. Although, this opinion holds some truth, the idea of giving people in power longer periods does not mean leading them to eternal dictatorships. The meaning of longer periods is limited time windows where each leader in power have the sufficient time and opportunity to engender change.
In conclusion, as a society built on the various pillars of powerful institutions, companies and enterprises, there is some risk in any decision we make towards one viewpoint or the other. However, it is crucial to build our future out of trust and hope rather than fear and suspicions. We should trust the people we choose to put in power and give them the chance to learn, plan and use their intelligence and creativity to be able to construct a valued continuous success.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 79, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...hange to happen, every leader must have a 'critical' amount of time. Th...
^
Line 5, column 467, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'takes'?
Suggestion: takes
...ing and its future goals. Sometimes, it take months if not years to be able to build...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 14.8657303371 175% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2524.0 2235.4752809 113% => OK
No of words: 474.0 442.535393258 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32489451477 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66599839874 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04570409707 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 267.0 215.323595506 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563291139241 0.4932671777 114% => OK
syllable_count: 783.9 704.065955056 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7989193789 60.3974514979 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.2 118.986275619 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7 23.4991977007 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 5.21951772744 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152676312389 0.243740707755 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0434457620009 0.0831039109588 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0330899536644 0.0758088955206 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0828516674813 0.150359130593 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0373362925976 0.0667264976115 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.1639044944 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.38706741573 113% => OK
difficult_words: 142.0 100.480337079 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.