Claim: In any field — business, politics, education, government — those in power should step down after five years.
Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
Leaders are essential to the success of any enterprise or government. For eg. Mukesh Ambani, has successfully lead Reliance, a telecom company, and dominated the market. The writer claims that for an enterprse to be successful new leadership should replace the existing one every five years. However, I mostly disagree with the author's argument because the new leadership might not always be more capable and effective.
It is necessary that there's a fair opportunity for everyone to be a leader and if the existing leaders are not performing up to the mark, they should be replaced by new ones. Five years time is sufficient for any leadership to show their potential and make a change for the society they live in. Since after five years it is possible that in some scenarios the present leadership has run out of ideas to successfully lead the enterprise, in that case, new leaders need to take up charge.
However in fields such as politics, businesses and education, it's after a long period of time that the true potential of leaders emerges. Consider a government which is working sedulously to make reforms to end poverty and corruption. In democratic countries like India, there are certain procedures which need to be followed before such reforms can be affected. It often takes time to make a change in these cases. Furthurmore, once the law has been enacted, it will take many more years before we start to notice its affect and finally see the situation ameliorating. Similarly, any change in the education system would also take quite a few years to show its affect. Therefore in these situations changing leadership in the middle of the revolutionary process can hinder the progress.
Moreover, it is highly possible that the current leadership is the most efficient one and there's no one more capable to uphold that responsibility. For example, Narendra Modi was re-elected as the Prime Minister of India after serving one five-year term. Although most poeple were not content with Modi's government, in the absence of any other comparable leadership, he was again chosen as the prime minister for another five years. Therefore, changing leadership is only beneficial when there's a more promising leadership in the picture.
To sum up, I'd like to say that author takes it too extreme by claiming that having new leaders would surely lead to success. In many scenarios, some of which discussed above, it's crucial that the government or business stick to the same leadership for success.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 111, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'leaded', 'led'.
Suggestion: leaded; led
...For eg. Mukesh Ambani, has successfully lead Reliance, a telecom company, and domina...
^^^^
Line 1, column 329, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...rs. However, I mostly disagree with the authors argument because the new leadership mig...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 22, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: there's
...nd effective. It is necessary that theres a fair opportunity for everyone to be a...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ew leaders need to take up charge. However in fields such as politics, businesses ...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 63, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
... as politics, businesses and education, its after a long period of time that the tr...
^^^
Line 9, column 80, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...inesses and education, its after a long period of time that the true potential of leaders emer...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 671, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...e quite a few years to show its affect. Therefore in these situations changing leadership...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 91, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: there's
...eadership is the most efficient one and theres no one more capable to uphold that resp...
^^^^^^
Line 13, column 489, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: there's
...ging leadership is only beneficial when theres a more promising leadership in the pict...
^^^^^^
Line 17, column 12, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'd
...dership in the picture. To sum up, Id like to say that author takes it too ex...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, however, if, moreover, similarly, so, therefore, as to, for example, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2107.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 416.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06490384615 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51620172871 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77696569326 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 215.323595506 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53125 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 676.8 704.065955056 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.310999013 60.3974514979 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.35 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1 5.21951772744 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 7.80617977528 128% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253561895086 0.243740707755 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0762916794276 0.0831039109588 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0572997369113 0.0758088955206 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149786762104 0.150359130593 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0466724946227 0.0667264976115 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 100.480337079 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.