claim: The emergence of the online "blogosphere" and social media has significantly weakened the quality of political discourse in the United States.Reason: When anyone can publish political opinions easily, standards for covering news and political topics will inevitably decline.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
Everyone has the right to freedom of expression, but getting a universal platform to express your opinions is something which the world has acquired recently. Social media has played a very vital role in helping people in expressing their views, discussing and in being cognizant of what's going on in our surroundings. Though, as it has been rightly said, too much of something can be harmful, even excessive misuse of such freedom comes at a cost.
Some 40 years back, when even owning a mobile phone was a luxury, who would have imagined conversing with strangers living on the other side of the globe would become so convenient. With the advent of social media and the online "blogosphere", it has become easier to express opinions on even the most trivial matters or the extremely sensitive ones like politics. Politics has become dinner table talk thanks to the wide range of exposure provided by the internet.
TV channels, newspapers and other traditional methods of news reporting have become obsolete, at least to the younger generations. There are only a handful of such channels which till date provide an unbiased, unfiltered opinion of the matter at hand. Most of them fail to be neutral when it comes to reporting matters related to politics because of their obligations to the left or the right. So naturally, people prefer getting a disinterested view rather than one that has been polished and exaggerated to an extent where it fails to portray things in true light. Social media is a platform for people from all point of views to express their opinion equally, and adjudicate and take a side.
Too many cooks spoil the broth. Social media comes with its disadvantages, people tend to form opinions very easily, and because not everyone is fully informed of the matter, they end up going with the crowd. The recent Wall Street scandal, that originated from a reddit channel blew out of proportion with everyone placing bets on the stock. What started as a way of punishing short traders, became a revolution which ended in both sides losing a lot of money. Such instances force us to rethink the extent of freedom which should be provided when expressing opinions.
Everyone should be allowed to publish their opinions easily, it is a welcome change for the United States, but such blatant misuse should be condemned.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-11 | YASSINETURKI | 50 | view |
| 2023-07-04 | Technoblade | 66 | view |
| 2022-12-18 | p_keerthika | 50 | view |
| 2022-07-24 | afroza2 | 83 | view |
| 2022-07-24 | afroza2 | 83 | view |
- In order to alleviate the serious unemployment problem in our town we should encourage Autotech to build its automobile manufacturing plant in our area The Hillview landfill which has been undeveloped for decades is a perfect site for this plant The build 66
- Claim An action is morally correct if the amount of good that results from the action is greater than the amount of bad that results from the action Reason When assessing the morality of an action the results of the action are more important than the inte 50
- Some people believe that increasing violence in the media is the cause of increasing violence in our society especially among children Others believe that children s peer groups and parental role models are a much more powerful influence on children s beh 58
- Claim An action is morally correct if the amount of good that results from the action is greater than the amount of bad that results from the action Reason When assessing the morality of an action the results of the action are more important than the inte 16
- Claim An action is morally correct if the amount of good that results from the action is greater than the amount of bad that results from the action Reason When assessing the morality of an action the results of the action are more important than the inte 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 284, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: what's
...s, discussing and in being cognizant of whats going on in our surroundings. Though, a...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 148, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'handfuls', 'handsful'?
Suggestion: handfuls; handsful
...e younger generations. There are only a handful of such channels which till date provid...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, at least
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1955.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 395.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94936708861 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74116079536 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 215.323595506 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572151898734 0.4932671777 116% => OK
syllable_count: 609.3 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9634627417 60.3974514979 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.0 118.986275619 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2352941176 23.4991977007 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 5.21951772744 19% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13513149642 0.243740707755 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0401570041857 0.0831039109588 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0361120339498 0.0758088955206 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.073946795196 0.150359130593 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0271165033237 0.0667264976115 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 14.1392134831 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 100.480337079 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.