Claim: When planning courses, educators should take into account the interests and suggestions of their students.
Reason: Students are more motivated to learn when they are interested in what they are studying.
As the assertion suggests that when courses are being planned by educators, they must take into consideration about the interest and suggestions of students on what they want to study. Fundamentally this assertion is true, and this is how a proper education system must be present in a school or college. Plethora of benefits come into picture when subjects or coursework are framed when considering the students requests.
Educational institutes worldwide should try to follow this mentioned assertion, as the students who come to gain knowledge in institutions and expertise in fields, so that they can shine in industry afterwards. The positive effects of this consideration regarding why subjects need to be accustomed according to the needs and likes of student are abundant. The students who know what they want to study and what their expectation from the institution must match. This gives rise to more composed and interactive learning process, by which students gain very deep understanding of the subjects which they are studying. Comparing to a mundane way of studying where the student maybe likes more practical approach to study, but the institution is not either not having any practical lab sessions in their curriculum or only has theoretical curriculum, this hinders the learning process. As the student is not receiving the knowledge on how to apply this theoretical knowledge in real world.
Currently the fast-paced industries around the world, have advanced so much, that even the need for fresh college graduates is very specific. The industries nowadays demand many skills form a fresh college undergraduate that form the basic platform for the students' knowledge and to thrive in the volatile situations of industry market. For instance, earlier the requirement of coding skills for fresh undergraduates was very minimal. Only computer sciences undergraduates used to require coding as one of the basic skills to get a job. But currently the situation has changed drastically, even undergraduates from electronics and mechanical need coding as one of their basic knowledge, which is demanded by the company in which they are applying for jobs. Currently a student knows that coding is required even before matriculating the institution, that practical skills such as coding is required to excel in the industrial environment. So, the institution in which they pursue their study must consider the likes and suggestions of student, on what to include in the curriculum. The benefits are not only from job perspective, but also this makes the students motivated to study and improve self-learning ability too.
Addition of an interesting curriculum is not only beneficial for students, but also beneficial for teachers, as when students become more interactive in the study sessions, they tend to ask more doubts and questions. Due to which the teacher also has to think more effectively and fast to answer the question with proper explanation .So here the teacher is also learning parallelly with the student, as sometimes students come up with doubts and questions out of the box, for which maybe the teacher could not give an answer. By this the teacher tries to to further study to solve the question, which in parallel increases the teacher's knowledge as well.
In conclusion, the likes and suggestions of the student must be taken into consideration when framing a coursework. Due to which the students can get a proper eagle eye view and even have knowledge on the minute details. Thereby, improving both the themselves and even the professor. Hence, I agree completely
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 885, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...lum, this hinders the learning process. As the student is not receiving the knowle...
^^
Line 5, column 258, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...te that form the basic platform for the students knowledge and to thrive in the volatile...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 333, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...wer the question with proper explanation .So here the teacher is also learning par...
^^
Line 7, column 335, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: So
...r the question with proper explanation .So here the teacher is also learning paral...
^^
Line 7, column 553, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: to
...ve an answer. By this the teacher tries to to further study to solve the question, wh...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 628, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...estion, which in parallel increases the teachers knowledge as well. In conclusion, t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 246, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'themselves'?
Suggestion: the; themselves
...minute details. Thereby, improving both the themselves and even the professor. Hence, I agree ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, may, regarding, so, well, as to, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 23.0 11.3162921348 203% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 75.0 58.6224719101 128% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3036.0 2235.4752809 136% => OK
No of words: 577.0 442.535393258 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26169844021 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.90110439584 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95999151348 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 260.0 215.323595506 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.450606585789 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 929.7 704.065955056 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.565507337 60.3974514979 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.5 118.986275619 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0416666667 23.4991977007 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.79166666667 5.21951772744 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 10.2758426966 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.349025579191 0.243740707755 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100994964302 0.0831039109588 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108045912017 0.0758088955206 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205266827953 0.150359130593 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0951997324214 0.0667264976115 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 14.1392134831 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 100.480337079 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.