Company management should conduct routine monitoring of all employee e-mail correspondence. Such monitoring will reduce the waste of resources such as time and system capacity, as well as protect the company from lawsuits.
The claim that any company's management system should conduct routine monitoring of all its employees' e-mails is one that I partially agree with. One of the most fundamental human rights is that of privacy and no other person or institution has the right to take that away. In this case, I do not agree with the claim. However, routine checks done with specific and targeted monitoring of e-mails could alleviate important company data from being stolen and could protect the company from lawsuits and in this case, I agree with the claim.
One of the most controversial scandals that shook the United States of America was the NSA scandal. The whistleblower Edward Snowden who had worked for the NSA claimed that they had access to all kinds of information about the citizens of USA and that they monitored all of their activities and collected data. This was done with the preface of security; claiming that such checks could help in early identification of possible terror attacks and help protects the people of the country. However, people errupted in anger over having their privacy taken away from them. Noone could do anything without having the feeling of someone from the government looking over them. It was highly publicised and the controversy shook the government, forcing them to apologise and state that all data would be erased.
Furthermore, many have also drawn parallels of this controversy to the masterpiece of George Orwell, the book 1984. Similar events take place in the book as well. The government run by a person called Big Brother, keeps a watch on all its citizens and their everyday doings. This was not to protect them from any harm but to squelch any form of rebellion against the tyrannical government. The USA doing the same could make its citizens vulnerable to targeted attacks based on their political opinion and could lead to the desecration of the whole democratic system. The same applies to companies as well. People would not be able to express their opinions and take possible complaints to higher officials for it could cost them their jobs if the matter were to be monitored by the same official they were to complain against. This would take away their voices in the company and make them prisoners in their own working environment.
In contrast, targeted monitoring could be implemented to help the comapny as well. Specific key words and data could be searched for in the employee e-mails to determine if any data has been leaked or stolen. This would help the company keep a check on their confidential information without disrupting the privacy of its employees. It should also be made mandatory that only the e-mail id given by the company must be monitored and not the private e-mails of the employees. This process could prove beneficial to all.
To conclude, the above examples serve as reason why this claim, although can prove to be quite effective must not be rigidly implemented. Though it has its benefits, it must ensure to not interfere in the privacy of the company's employees and if need be must conduct monitoring very ethically, being mutually beneficial to all.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 93, Rule ID: KEY_WORDS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'keywords'?
Suggestion: keywords
...d to help the comapny as well. Specific key words and data could be searched for in the e...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, look, so, well, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 12.4196629213 177% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 33.0505617978 151% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 74.0 58.6224719101 126% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2613.0 2235.4752809 117% => OK
No of words: 528.0 442.535393258 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94886363636 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.79356345386 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59570526195 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 245.0 215.323595506 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.464015151515 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 808.2 704.065955056 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.2838407158 60.3974514979 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.52 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.12 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.56 5.21951772744 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224299331156 0.243740707755 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0684746994035 0.0831039109588 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0828788072029 0.0758088955206 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137521267638 0.150359130593 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0650376711607 0.0667264976115 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 100.480337079 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.