curriculum
Throughout the world, the national curriculum to study for students has never ceased to draw public attention and provoke debates about it, so it is important to take into consideration this issue. Opinions vary from person to person. Many hold the opinion that all students should have the same curriculum while others opposed this opinion. I, to a huge extent, believe that the disadvantages of it far outweigh the advantages. I will explicate my reasons behind this statement through the following essay.
The first thing that immediately comes into my mind is that it is unfair and it does not consider the abilities. To be more specific, some students have the capability to finish their education curriculum earlier due to their high ingenuity and high efficiency that they have. As a result, if all the students are asked to study the same curriculum, the aforementioned students can not use their ability to decrease their education period to enter college earlier.
The second reason makes me hold this opinion is that students have different interest regarding the majors they want to study in the future. Suppose, for example, some students prefer to continue their studies on math fields majors like engineering, so it is irrational they take courses about other fields more than math and vice versa. Indeed, this statement also does not take students' favorites into account concerning courses they need to take.
To wrap the argument, if we take a glance into the drawbacks of the same national curriculum for all students, it will be soon recognized that it is not worthwhile as it is unfair and it is does not consider students' interest.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 236, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun hold seems to be countable; consider using: 'Many holds'.
Suggestion: Many holds
...e. Opinions vary from person to person. Many hold the opinion that all students should ha...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, regarding, second, so, while, for example, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 58.6224719101 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1393.0 2235.4752809 62% => OK
No of words: 275.0 442.535393258 62% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06545454545 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.55969084622 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67649703225 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 215.323595506 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 704.065955056 63% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.3240454052 60.3974514979 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.083333333 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9166666667 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.91666666667 5.21951772744 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165573430563 0.243740707755 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0640232754108 0.0831039109588 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0762842222515 0.0758088955206 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119102054298 0.150359130593 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0689797856192 0.0667264976115 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 100.480337079 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.