The author claims that educational institutions should divert students from the field of study that are not likely to provide success to the student. Educational institutes act as a guide that can ensure that students would direct their career in a right way. However, certain situations might require educational institutes to leave the students to decide on their own and rather hep them to guide their way to the field they are interested in. The statement requires crucial analysis in order to accept it as legit.
Firstly, education institution could try to calibrate the students passion, interest before trying to dissuade them. There can be two possibilities that can emerge. One is educational institutes getting to know students who have decided what their interest is. Second, there are students who have not yet discovered what there interests are. It is likely that institution would dissuade the second category from pursuing in a particular field. Rather there might be possibility that students belonging to latter category might seek interest, passion and might be determined in the later stages of pursuing period. Hence, in this case institution might be a danger for students career life.
However, institution on successful recognition of interest in students might be helpful to dissuade them from the current field they reside in to the ones they like. For instance, student who is exclusively talented in sports might be finding difficult to pursue in science field. Institution would rather guide the student to achieve great things in sports. It is true that educational institution has responsibility to guide the students and moreover students have to also seek help from institution for its experienced faculties to guide step by step process required to get in particular field.
In summary, educational institution must crucially handle the scenarios when it comes to dissuading field of study. Educational institutes could help students by providing advantages and disadvantage of field that students are interested in. Evaluation of students passion or interest up to the perfection is pertinent before deciding whether to divert students path.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 245, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a right way" with adverb for "right"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...that students would direct their career in a right way. However, certain situations might requ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ysis in order to accept it as legit. Firstly, education institution could try...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 65, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
... institution could try to calibrate the students passion, interest before trying to diss...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 378, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rests are. It is likely that institution would dissuade the second category from ...
^^
Line 3, column 452, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Rather,
...ry from pursuing in a particular field. Rather there might be possibility that student...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e a danger for students career life. However, institution on successful recog...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 357, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e the student to achieve great things in sports. It is true that educational ins...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...required to get in particular field. In summary, educational institution must...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 377, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ciding whether to divert students path.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, hence, however, if, moreover, second, so, for instance, in particular, in summary, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1846.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 341.0 442.535393258 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41348973607 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87174495754 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 215.323595506 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.483870967742 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 576.9 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.9280502794 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.555555556 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9444444444 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.38888888889 5.21951772744 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221886381162 0.243740707755 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0885238043024 0.0831039109588 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0550722278107 0.0758088955206 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161511452933 0.150359130593 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0258930566858 0.0667264976115 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 14.1392134831 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 100.480337079 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.