Educational institutions should actively encourage their students to choose fields of study in which jobs are plentiful.
Here, the statement contends that educational institutions should encourage their children to choose the field in which the job opportunity is very high. I believe that each student should have the right to select and explore the field in which he/she wants to obtain mastery. So, the task of educational institutions is to help the students to choose the field in which they are interested, but not to encourage them for the fields having lucrative jobs. So, I disagree with the contention of the statement.
The chief reason why I disagree with the proposition is that, according to me, if institutions will encourage the students for lucrative jobs, most of the students will select the fields in which the job opportunities are very high. So, the number of students in a particular field becomes large in numbers. So there will be a great competition between them for a job when they complete their graduation. Therefore, only the students having extraordinary talent can secure the job and all the remaining students have to survive the situation.
Furthermore, giving idolatry to the particular field makes other fields ludicrous to people.
In addition, if we give excessive devotion to a particular field then students try to secure their seat in that field, which results in less number of students in other fields. For example, nowadays, in the twenty-first century, institutions and also people encourage students to make a career in fields like computer engineering, mechanical engineering, and information technology. So, students' first priority is to get admission in one of these courses, which results in less number of students in other courses and makes the seat vacant. Because of this, the market can =not get the talented students as the number of students in a particular line is very less.
There are also certain cases which contradict the statement's contention. For example, according to the survey of Kolkatta University, it is found that the most of the students pursuing computer engineering and mechanical engineering in Kolkatta University compared with other fields. However, agriculture students are viewed ludicrously, but many of them can start lucrative jobs and other business before their counterpart gets the job. Another example is Sachin Tendulkar, the former Indian cricketer. He is the only cricketer who has scored 100 international centuries. If his teacher had told him to select engineering as his career then I hope he would not get that much success. So, the students' interest also plays the chief role in their career.
At the final analysis, according to me, students should select the course in which they have an interest and also the educational institutions should help them for selection of the field which is beneficial for their career.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 12, column 51, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'statements'' or 'statement's'?
Suggestion: statements'; statement's
...also certain cases which contradict the statements contention. For example, according to t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, so, then, therefore, for example, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2368.0 2235.4752809 106% => OK
No of words: 452.0 442.535393258 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2389380531 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61088837703 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88261601604 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.446902654867 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 720.0 704.065955056 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.6448081244 60.3974514979 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.761904762 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5238095238 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2380952381 5.21951772744 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.405405484664 0.243740707755 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128507131915 0.0831039109588 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11514701645 0.0758088955206 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236146313592 0.150359130593 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121996874946 0.0667264976115 183% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.