Educational institutions should dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
Educational institutions are known to shape the career of a child as well as his or her future. Educational institutions are tasked with imparting valuable and pragmatic knowledge to the students that attend it. As a result, people are of the opinion that educational institutions should dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed. I disagree with such a viewpoint, since in my opinion, the best path for a student is the one that the student chooses for themselves. It is the educational institute's responsibility to support students and help them achieve their goals, rather than deter them from it. I will present further reasoning behind my position, in the paragraphs below.
It is often the case that institutions are known for their prowess in one particular domain, such as mathematics, science, or literature. This occurs due to the proficiency of their respective faculties, in their respective fields. If a student is present in an educational institute that is known for it's mathematics background, but is himself inclined towards the domain of machine learning, might be suggested by his faculties that his choice of domain might not make him successful and he should choose mathematics as a domain. Such an instance is not true, since machine learning also requires a thorough knowledge of mathematics, dissuading a student from following what he likes is a sin committed by the faculties. There are prejudices that come in play when a person gives out suggestion to his fellow human. These prejudices, on the part of the teachers might affect the student's future, since the student might be persuing a field which he might never be competent in.
It is not just the internal variables of an educational institution that might alter a student's career choice, it is also the variables that exist outside the educational institutions. During the 1920's, the Soviet Union would decide the scientific experiments that a scientist should perform, and would ban scientists who opposed such a rein on their normal working. It is safe to say that Soviet Union did not make any significant discoveries during this time. Such a situation can occur in the contemporary world as well. It might be the case that government officials inform the college hierarchies to keep a check on the innovations that are being conjured up in their institute premises, and dissuade students from pursuing research that is of no use to the country. If such a case occurs, it is clear that educational institutions are protecting their own interests, at the expense of a student's career. It is cases like these, that bolster my claim that - it is always ideal for students to select their own path, rather than depending on others to guide them.
Proponents of the above claim might argue that students below the tenth grade might not have a very clear idea about the career path that they wish to pursue in the future. I agree with such a claim, and for children until the tenth grade, it would be ideal that they study a well-balanced curriculum that helps them discover certain key aspects of all the domains. This will ultimately help them discern the pros and cons of each domain and then decide the domain, that best suits their interest. Such a path will make sure that students are capable enough to make their own future choices, and not be influenced by the noises of the world around them.
In sum, I stand against the statement that educational institutions should dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed. Educational institutes do not possess a magic ball which will help them see whether a student achieve success if he chooses a particular domain, rather it is always advisable to let students make their own life choices. It is the institute's responsibility to provide support for the students, so that they can achieve their dream.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 533, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'institutes'' or 'institute's'?
Suggestion: institutes'; institute's
...s for themselves. It is the educational institutes responsibility to support students and ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 393, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'institutes'' or 'institute's'?
Suggestion: institutes'; institute's
... make their own life choices. It is the institutes responsibility to provide support for t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, well, such as, as a result, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 34.0 19.5258426966 174% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 12.4196629213 177% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 31.0 11.3162921348 274% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 88.0 33.0505617978 266% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 78.0 58.6224719101 133% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3275.0 2235.4752809 147% => OK
No of words: 658.0 442.535393258 149% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97720364742 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.06473204393 4.55969084622 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81121571829 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 292.0 215.323595506 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.44376899696 0.4932671777 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1002.6 704.065955056 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 19.0 6.24550561798 304% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.8515840901 60.3974514979 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.961538462 118.986275619 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3076923077 23.4991977007 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.21951772744 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236122950671 0.243740707755 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0808336190396 0.0831039109588 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104407360862 0.0758088955206 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170200999779 0.150359130593 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102224353469 0.0667264976115 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 14.1392134831 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.8420337079 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 100.480337079 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.