Educators should find out what students want included in the curriculum and then offer it to them.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Teachers are more important in any student’s life as they are the biggest motivators for them. The prompt recommends that tutors should take an effort to find what their students want to learn and should add it to the curriculum and teach them. In my opinion, I agree with the suggestion and argue that students only learn something if they are interested in it.
To begin, career path for an individual should be made my himself/herself rather than going by the flow. Students can take the suggestions from the elders and experienced people but at the end it is an individual who must take the decision of the career. For instance, a student wants to learn coding and grow up as a developer he can take coding as his majors rather than sticking to biology classes for the entire year. The above example states that a person can take a subject which he is interested in and want to grow in it and he can make the teachers to add it into curriculum.
Further, tutors should also take the minimum effort to learn the student’s interests and goals so that they can help in motivating them. Teachers can guide the students who are obstinate in the nature into a proper career path. For instance, a student who has no interest in any of the subject but interested in graphic designing, tutor can change him to a graphic designing class and he can pursue a successful career in it .
Every student has different interests in subjects they want to learn but there will be few students who have same interested subjects. These little groups can be put in a same class and offer the subjects they want to learn. However, this is the effort made mutually by both the educators and students. Students after selecting the subject must learn it properly otherwise it is a waste of their tutor’s effort. For instance, a student might take a particular subject just because her friends took it. This shouldn’t be the case as it is her career to grow not her friends. The example illustrates that students should be serious enough in selecting their subjects.
However, it is not possible that curriculum can have all the subjects that were given by the students but it must provide at least basic knowledge on the subject they are interested in. This leads to the mutual benefit of both the school and the students.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 296, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to code'.
Suggestion: to code
... For instance, a student wants to learn coding and grow up as a developer he can take ...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 431, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... he can pursue a successful career in it . Every student has different inter...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, at least, for instance, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 33.0505617978 148% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1936.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 408.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74509803922 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49433085973 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65870808216 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 215.323595506 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.44362745098 0.4932671777 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 586.8 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9021922491 60.3974514979 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.894736842 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4736842105 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.42105263158 5.21951772744 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160918465845 0.243740707755 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0589848396966 0.0831039109588 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0482417769979 0.0758088955206 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103609346674 0.150359130593 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0618164071855 0.0667264976115 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 48.8420337079 137% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 12.1639044944 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.23 8.38706741573 86% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 100.480337079 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.