Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and to disobey and resist unjust laws.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position
Discussing the laws in society, we can all agree to the point that obeying laws and living in a disciplined way is one of the crucial factors that distinguishes us from other animals. This is the basis on which our civilization has occurred, we can live together by following a set of principles decided by us for the desire of a peaceful life. The rules are for the betterment of us we should have a say in it because if not, obeying the rules will be equivalent to slavery. Also the rule making committee is comprised of humans, we cannot expect that his ideologies would be perfect for everyone so every individual does have responsibility to obey the just laws and disobey the unjust laws.
Talking about the just laws, one example is the law regarding the ban of plastic in various cities in India. Although because of this law it has been a difficult task to manage the daily routine works since plastic was found in nearly one of the five items and now there is a need to find alternatives which are commensurate as regards to its price. Considering the positive effects, ocean pollution would be much under control leadind to a cleaner ocean and hence encouraging better marine life. Along with that, most harmful effect of plastic was choking up of all drainage lines and resulting in huge floods every year. If the law in properly obeyed the intensity of floods will reduce and we'll be saved from alot of monetary damage. although the law is not comforting at the start we should abide by it.
Not necessary that we should abide by all the laws in society. We are an intelligent species and smart enough to distinguish just laws and unjust laws. Unjust laws recently introduced was the Goods and service Tax. The law wasn't unjust but the rates of tax described in that were really high resulting in a very less profit remaining for the people as all the money was diverted to the government in some or other way. History is proof that people have stood against it and government was forced to reduce the tax to reasonable rates.
So talking about the laws, it might be completely justified or sometimes partially or not at all. It is the citizens or the common people living the society who have to decide whether the laws are valid and sensible based on the future pros and cons and not only comfort. One should also look if they are morally correct so in future it is better place to live in for everybody
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 477, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...he rules will be equivalent to slavery. Also the rule making committee is comprised ...
^^^^
Line 1, column 508, Rule ID: IS_COMPRISED_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprises' or 'consists of' or 'is composed of'?
Suggestion: comprises; consists of; is composed of
...slavery. Also the rule making committee is comprised of humans, we cannot expect that his ideol...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 737, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Although
... be saved from alot of monetary damage. although the law is not comforting at the start ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 737, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... be saved from alot of monetary damage. although the law is not comforting at the start ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 223, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
... was the Goods and service Tax. The law wasnt unjust but the rates of tax described i...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, look, really, regarding, so, well, as for, as regards, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1985.0 2235.4752809 89% => OK
No of words: 436.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.55275229358 5.05705443957 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56953094068 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48681714889 2.79657885939 89% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 215.323595506 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520642201835 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 649.8 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.629287554 60.3974514979 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.277777778 118.986275619 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2222222222 23.4991977007 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.21951772744 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189052984705 0.243740707755 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0578130021161 0.0831039109588 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0485319032391 0.0758088955206 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107367178189 0.150359130593 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0489585912801 0.0667264976115 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.41 12.1639044944 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 100.480337079 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.