Governments should focus on solving the intermediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve anticipated problems of the future.
Can a better future be promised without the certainty of a stable present? I guess no. The former question can be more generalized in the matter of growing degradation of the world. That is instead of thinking about future prospectives; existing conundrums should be solved.
Many problems related to environmental degradation, pollution, global warming and so on should be addressed with exigency. Melting glaciers and depletion of the ozone layer are the alarming effects. Forest layers are vanishing and water table levels are diminishing leading to the decimation of the ecosystem. According to the famous dictum: "Prevention is better than cure", we should take averting steps rather than waiting for an inexorable situation following this deterioration. Effective Afforestation campaigns should be included in the governmental schemes so as to make the public aware of the destruction followed by our immoral acts towards the earth. Lastly, many areas across the world have experienced a dip in temperature as well as a drastic change in the apogee of temperature marked during summers. The above observation is not just mere speculation but a signal of the slow destruction of the future.
Two important economic problems which are anticipated to be solved in the coming future are unemployment and poverty. Although, unemployment acts as a harbinger for poverty; governments aim at eradicating poverty rather than unemployment. According to India's 2019 census survey, the unemployment rate has almost doubled in 2 years. The fact which needs to be highlighted here is that educated people are without promising jobs. Hence, uneducated people below the poverty line have an insecure future. Governments promote charitable programs but the increment in recruitments in different sectors was not significant in the past few years. Only a small fraction of the world comprises of the world's wealth, which is another evidence highlighting the non-uniformity of wealth all across the globe.
Enormous problem of traffic in densely-populated India is still unresolved. Government endorses the building of new highways, flyovers as well as metros in order to convert the cities into a metropolitan one. But the growing traffic increases the wait on every signal and thus burning more of fuels leading to an exponential increase in air pollution. Development is necessary for the future but a proper intermediate substitute for such a development should also be thought of. Mere endorsing and the use of technology is a futile approach.
Amendments in the constitution should be made to reduce the crime rate all over the nation and to protect terrorism. Different educational schemes should be made to bolster the right to education(RTE in India) and to reduce the illiteracy rate. Better health care facilities in suburban areas should be taken care of. Better health will reduce the mortality rates and will increase life expectancy in the country.
To conclude, it is a sheer wastage of time, money and effort to wait for a disaster to occur, in order to provide relief to the victims. Thus, the government has a huge responsibility of focusing on both immediate problems of today and plan such that the anticipated problems of the future are also efficiently dealt with.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 576, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...be included in the governmental schemes so as to make the public aware of the destructio...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 675, Rule ID: COMPRISES_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprises' or 'consists of'?
Suggestion: comprises; consists of
...ars. Only a small fraction of the world comprises of the worlds wealth, which is another evi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 692, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
... fraction of the world comprises of the worlds wealth, which is another evidence highl...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, lastly, so, still, thus, well, as to, i guess, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 33.0505617978 24% => OK
Preposition: 77.0 58.6224719101 131% => OK
Nominalization: 26.0 12.9106741573 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2780.0 2235.4752809 124% => OK
No of words: 520.0 442.535393258 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34615384615 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77530192783 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11386240114 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 287.0 215.323595506 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551923076923 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 887.4 704.065955056 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.2370786517 143% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.6420199717 60.3974514979 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.8620689655 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9310344828 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.72413793103 5.21951772744 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 17.0 5.13820224719 331% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220551720543 0.243740707755 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0435073535424 0.0831039109588 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0639186023086 0.0758088955206 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.09862293446 0.150359130593 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0599953933091 0.0667264976115 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.1392134831 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 160.0 100.480337079 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.