Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Science is the backbone towards the development and modernization of a nation, if not the world. Ever since the discovery of electricity, which is still considered to be the most important scientific discovery till date, governments throughout the world has been lenient towards scientific research and development. Even though profligate use of government funds for such purpose might lead to reduction of allocated funds for other important sectors, many developed countries have been openhearted and altruistic about R&D or research and development funds. This claim can be bolstered by several points.
Recent Covid-19 pandemic has slapped both the first world and third world countries on their healthcare systems. This also, gave a blow to their pride on their scientific research and development and specifically on the field of medicine. Even most developed and high-tech countries such as the United States of America, Switzerland, United Kingdom, China and Japan, could not stand against the initial blow of the Virus of Covid-19. On the contrary, third world countries such as India and Russia have been successful at eradicating the effects of the virus, by developing vaccinations such as Covaxin and Sputnik respectively. One might argue that the failure of the first world countries in fighting the initial outrage of the virus can be mitigated on doctors or medicinal scientists and lack of allocation of funds by the governments, but that is inexact. No government have placed any restriction on scientific research and development.
Another noticeable improvement is the defense sector. The world is aware of the Israeli armed unmanned boat for surveillance and protection duties, and the Iron Dome interceptor. While the former has been the first of its kind and came into existence after a massive investment of around $400 mn USD, the second has caught attention of defense research organizations worldwide during the recent and ongoing Israel-Gaza war. the Iron Dome interceptor has the ability to fire at drones and choppers at a range of a whopping 6miles. Though Gaza is controlled by the terrorist organization ISIS, they lack such large-scale military equipment. Without the government’s unconditional and irrational support, achieving such feats had not been possible.
However, not imposing any restrictions on the allotted funds, may lead to misuse and even theft by some corrupted scientists. Some unprincipled scientists fulfill their personal and financial goals with these funds and cheats out of the governments by providing scrupulous audit information. To keep a check on such fraudulent and degenerating behaviors, the governments should perform stricter audits and accounts checks, frequently and anonymously. Though such shady behaviors are very profuse, the proportion of honest scientists and dishonest scientists in a country differs by a vast number. Consequently, imposing too much restrictions can lead to decline in creativity among the honest scientists.
To conclude, imposing restrictions on scientific research and development, has both positive and negative repercussions, depending on the severity of the standpoints. While too much restrictions are bound to create negative aftereffects, not imposing any restrictions can be taken for granted as well. But at desperate times, desperate measures are needed, in order to forestall the massive impacts of the situations at hand. It is not feasible to generalize whether the governments should place restrictions on scientific research and developments.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 423, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...the recent and ongoing Israel-Gaza war. the Iron Dome interceptor has the ability t...
^^^
Line 4, column 625, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...vast number. Consequently, imposing too much restrictions can lead to decline in cre...
^^^^
Line 5, column 178, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
... severity of the standpoints. While too much restrictions are bound to create negati...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, may, second, so, still, third, well, while, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 33.0 14.8657303371 222% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 33.0505617978 36% => OK
Preposition: 72.0 58.6224719101 123% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 12.9106741573 178% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3018.0 2235.4752809 135% => OK
No of words: 540.0 442.535393258 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58888888889 5.05705443957 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82057051367 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15994521666 2.79657885939 113% => OK
Unique words: 283.0 215.323595506 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524074074074 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 909.9 704.065955056 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.2608674357 60.3974514979 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.72 118.986275619 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.52 5.21951772744 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175138646391 0.243740707755 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0500632801418 0.0831039109588 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.057274949071 0.0758088955206 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0982865695125 0.150359130593 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0512668570561 0.0667264976115 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 14.1392134831 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.1639044944 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.38706741573 114% => OK
difficult_words: 166.0 100.480337079 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.7820224719 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.