The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries.
The speaker maintains that greatness of individuals only decided by retrospect, not by their contemoraries. In my view, I am strongly disagree with the speaker in some points because of the unwarranted generalization of the speaker. In some cases it is truth that greatness of a person only come after the time he or she lived. like in physical science, scientific theory, or something that need to varified in the future but in the sector of arts and business success is often come in the time of the nascent of creation and in other hand in business it is not certain that greatness of business come in that time or come long after from starting.
In most of the cases it is believed that scientific theory is not constant and in most cases needs further investigation to take that theory as a fact. There are many example found in the history of the science where it is observed that some theory get popular after the inception of the theory but in later time that theory proved as false and sometime it also happens that after the inception of a theory because of the lackage of proper evidence some theory got rejected by the comtemporaries but adored by the future generation when with proper evidence the theory proved as right. In some cases it is also true that greatness of invention not recognized by the contemporary because of less practical use of that specific theory, after a few generation when much more practical use of that theory occured. In theory it is not rare that after one hundred year after the inception of the theory get popularity and real greatness of that specific work recognized by the people of future generation not by the contemporaries of the individual who is the creator of that theory or work.
In case of arts it is truth that arts got recognized right after its inception and even got recognized in their early part of the life. Mozart got recognized right after his work popular in the his contemporary society. Pablo Picaso also got recognized and even got famous in his time. scientiest like Newton, Einstein, Stephen Hawking got recognized and counted as great scientiest in their respective time. In technology sector it also not rare that individual not got recognized by the his or her contemporaries. Steve Jobs counted as one of the genious mind of the twenty century because of his contribution in the sector of technology. Bill Gates one of the american super rich famous for his contribution in the sector of DOS and later WINDOWS that make path for the further development of computer that lead by the people of the america. Henry Ford one of the american business man got success in his living time and his invention created new america and world where car got much affordable than ever before.
Admittedly, it is not always truth that individual got recognized right after their invention or creation by something. In many cases converse example also found in the history of the man kind. From the very incient time it is believed that earth surface is flat but a great scientiest claimed that this believe because of that claim one of less famous scientiest's claim got rejectes in his time and after centuries today we know earth surface is not flat actually. In this case, it is right that individual's greatness revealed in future not in his or her time but it one aspect of the scene. Sports-- more specifically soccer, baseball, basket ball, tennis, golf and all other game greatness of an indiviual got recognized his or her prime time not by the retrospect.
In sum, it not certain that every works of individual got recognized by his or her comtemporaries and it is also true that not every person not recognized by contemporaries. In most of the cases it depends on the prespective situation and practical use of the work or theory of an individual.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 135, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'disagreed'.
Suggestion: disagreed
...ontemoraries. In my view, I am strongly disagree with the speaker in some points because...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 329, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Like
...ly come after the time he or she lived. like in physical science, scientific theory,...
^^^^
Line 3, column 163, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun example seems to be countable; consider using: 'many examples'.
Suggestion: many examples
...o take that theory as a fact. There are many example found in the history of the science wh...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 203, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...many example found in the history of the science where it is observed that some t...
^^
Line 3, column 744, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun generation seems to be countable; consider using: 'few generations'.
Suggestion: few generations
...al use of that specific theory, after a few generation when much more practical use of that th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...is the creator of that theory or work. In case of arts it is truth that arts got ...
^^
Line 4, column 190, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'his'?
Suggestion: the; his
...ognized right after his work popular in the his contemporary society. Pablo Picaso also...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 286, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Scientiest
...gnized and even got famous in his time. scientiest like Newton, Einstein, Stephen Hawking ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 485, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'his'?
Suggestion: the; his
...e that individual not got recognized by the his or her contemporaries. Steve Jobs count...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 305, Rule ID: BELIEVE_BELIEF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'belief' (noun) instead of believe (verb)?
Suggestion: belief
...ut a great scientiest claimed that this believe because of that claim one of less famou...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 498, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...ctually. In this case, it is right that individuals greatness revealed in future not in his...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, if, so, in many cases, in most cases, in my view, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 12.4196629213 8% => OK
Conjunction : 30.0 14.8657303371 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 32.0 11.3162921348 283% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 71.0 33.0505617978 215% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 110.0 58.6224719101 188% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 12.9106741573 170% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3161.0 2235.4752809 141% => OK
No of words: 666.0 442.535393258 150% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74624624625 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.08005667302 4.55969084622 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73249718485 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 215.323595506 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.354354354354 0.4932671777 72% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1024.2 704.065955056 145% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 14.0 4.38483146067 319% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 86.9645865825 60.3974514979 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.434782609 118.986275619 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.9565217391 23.4991977007 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.65217391304 5.21951772744 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 7.80617977528 141% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160755606924 0.243740707755 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0606675681297 0.0831039109588 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0708968725089 0.0758088955206 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.092048792399 0.150359130593 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0446508716318 0.0667264976115 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 14.1392134831 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.38706741573 88% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 100.480337079 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.