It is the responsibility of the government to support artists. Explain to what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
The author of the issue state that it is incumbent upon the government to patronize art and artist in a given society. Due to the controversial nature of this question there is not a general argument on this issue. I am, however, to a great extent of the conviction that one of the main, if not the only, duties of each government is meeting the existing demands of its artists. In the ensuing paragraphs some convincing reasons will be delineated to collaborate my personal stance.
To commence, artists in all society, regardless of their major, introduce the culture and customs of that country to the other countries worldwide. This reason explain why the government should put artists in their first priority when it comes to budget allocation. Broadly speaking, artists are among the most vulnerable member of society whose main concern is producing delicate piece of art. If the government patronize artists financially they do not look for a secondary job to earn enough money to fill their stomach. To elucidate more on the issue when a talented artists does not make money out of creating art, he/she look for a more profitable job. The one that he/she can make living with. As a corollary, due to less attention paid, the quality of piece of art deteriorates. The importance of the issue is to the extent that not until artists are certain about their future do they produce high quality works.
Another reason that cannot go unnoticed is that by supporting artists, the government can enrich the culture of that country and transmit it to the next generation. To put it in general word, the culture of a country is like a pillars that stabilizes all the countries and nation that live in that country. It is generally held as an axiom that the passage of time adversely affects the cultural heritage of a country and most of these legacies that have been transmitted generation to generation do not resist the test of time. That’s why artists can play an irreplaceable role in this realm.
However, what I alluded to above cannot be overgeneralized to all contexts. Alongside with the innumerable benefits it has, indisputably, if the government support the artists it might impose its value upon the piece of art produce by the artists. That being so, the real value of art, which is expression of artists feeling, is question more simply stated, that interference of government might not be always productive.
In light of the reasons elaborated, I reiterate that if the government patronize artists, they are encouraged to produce quality works. It's due to the fact that they introduce culture of a country to the world and the only profession that they have expertise is art, which is why it is highly recommend that the authorities put this issue their first priority.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 572, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'artist'?
Suggestion: artist
...idate more on the issue when a talented artists does not make money out of creating art...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 628, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'looks'.
Suggestion: looks
... make money out of creating art, he/she look for a more profitable job. The one that...
^^^^
Line 5, column 226, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a pillar' or simply 'pillars'?
Suggestion: a pillar; pillars
... word, the culture of a country is like a pillars that stabilizes all the countries and n...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 294, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'recommended'.
Suggestion: recommended
...rtise is art, which is why it is highly recommend that the authorities put this issue the...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 362, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es put this issue their first priority.
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['first', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'second', 'so', 'broadly speaking', 'in general', 'to a great extent']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.241904761905 0.240241500013 101% => OK
Verbs: 0.148571428571 0.157235817809 94% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0647619047619 0.0880659088768 74% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0514285714286 0.0497285424764 103% => OK
Pronouns: 0.047619047619 0.0444667217837 107% => OK
Prepositions: 0.125714285714 0.12292977631 102% => OK
Participles: 0.0342857142857 0.0406280797675 84% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.7821401117 2.79330140395 100% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0380952380952 0.030933414821 123% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.131428571429 0.0997080785238 132% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0171428571429 0.0249443105267 69% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0266666666667 0.0148568991511 179% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2802.0 2732.02544248 103% => OK
No of words: 475.0 452.878318584 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.89894736842 6.0361032391 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66845742379 4.58838876751 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.345263157895 0.366273622748 94% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.282105263158 0.280924506359 100% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.187368421053 0.200843997647 93% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.134736842105 0.132149295362 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7821401117 2.79330140395 100% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 219.290929204 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.467368421053 0.48968727796 95% => OK
Word variations: 52.9621857661 55.4138127331 96% => OK
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6194690265 102% => OK
Sentence length: 22.619047619 23.380412469 97% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.2599946993 59.4972553346 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.428571429 141.124799967 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.619047619 23.380412469 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.428571428571 0.674092028746 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.21349557522 96% => OK
Readability: 50.8295739348 51.4728631049 99% => OK
Elegance: 1.62307692308 1.64882698954 98% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.487634243306 0.391690518653 124% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.118702567481 0.123202303941 96% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0893476394476 0.077325440228 116% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.575351760313 0.547984918172 105% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.173236549149 0.149214159877 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.218266543171 0.161403998019 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0776195197783 0.0892212321368 87% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.499719960481 0.385218514788 130% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0618730942224 0.0692045440612 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.371580968731 0.275328986314 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0546069209207 0.0653680567796 84% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.4325221239 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.30420353982 38% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88274336283 143% => OK
Positive topic words: 10.0 7.22455752212 138% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.66592920354 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 2.70907079646 185% => OK
Total topic words: 17.0 13.5995575221 125% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.