Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
It is not rare in today's world that we hear of a convict committing murder, or a thief stealing expensive items/antiques from a store or maybe, chain snatching. All these articles or stories can be read almost daily in the newspapers or seen in news channels. When we hear about these types of news, we generally make a negative image of that convict, thief in our minds. We trust the Police and the law makers blindly without thinking twice. Noone thinks about questioning the law makers asking why this happened? what was the motive behind this crime ? Was it a bitter relation with the murderer ? or Was it because the convict was also wronged at one point of time ? The answers to these questions might lead us to think that the claim mentioned to be true.
Laws are the basic building blocks of a society's civil order system. To maintain order, discipline in the society, laws play an important role. However, we need to completely analyze the crime before applying a laws and rules to punish the wrong-doer. I completely agree with the claim that laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places before coming to a conclusion on a crime.
A survey conducted on the prisoners of the Central Jail stated that 85% of the criminals have had experience of their victim doing them wrong. This number depicts that most of the times, crime committed is a reaction to a situation,rather than being a complete action as a whole. Laws have punished these individuals on basis of a reaction and this proves, that laws dont go deep into the matter to analyze it completely and find the real moral culprit. This scenario further supports the claim as it evidences that laws should take account of circumstances before deciding on the punishment.
There are some cases where a criminal might commit a crime, unintentionally or to save themselves or someone else from parlous threat. Examples of these include young children or teenagers who are subjected to abuse, might harm the abuser, or a women threatening a person who has intentions of defiling her. These types of cases require close scrutiny to place, times and circumstances to decide on the criminal. This can only happen if there are laws which are subject to change.
In conclusion, I concede that laws should take into account the situations and the setting where the crime has taken place to decide the crime, criminal and the course of punishment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 516, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: What
...he law makers asking why this happened? what was the motive behind this crime ? Was ...
^^^^
Line 1, column 601, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Or
...t a bitter relation with the murderer ? or Was it because the convict was also wro...
^^
Line 5, column 232, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , rather
...e committed is a reaction to a situation,rather than being a complete action as a whole...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 368, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...f a reaction and this proves, that laws dont go deep into the matter to analyze it c...
^^^^
Line 7, column 246, Rule ID: WOMAN_WOMEN[1]
Message: 'woman' is the singular form of 'women'. Consider using 'woman'?
Suggestion: woman
...d to abuse, might harm the abuser, or a women threatening a person who has intentions...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 338, Rule ID: CLOSE_SCRUTINY[1]
Message: Use simply 'scrutiny'.
Suggestion: scrutiny
...iling her. These types of cases require close scrutiny to place, times and circumstances to de...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, so, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2035.0 2235.4752809 91% => OK
No of words: 420.0 442.535393258 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84523809524 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52701905584 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68795261886 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 215.323595506 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554761904762 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 634.5 704.065955056 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.6806593357 60.3974514979 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.5 118.986275619 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0909090909 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.86363636364 5.21951772744 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 16.0 5.13820224719 311% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157144014107 0.243740707755 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.046123003955 0.0831039109588 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0645476543113 0.0758088955206 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0963499614172 0.150359130593 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0467192064177 0.0667264976115 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 14.1392134831 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 100.480337079 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.