Leaders are created by the demands that are placed on them.
The speaker’s assertion is that leaders are created by the demands placed on them. From my personal experience, I tend to agree with this statement to the extent that demands play an important role in creating leaders, but there also exist some exceptions.
There are many kinds of leaders in the world, from as small as a leader of a study group in school, to as big as the leader of a country. But all leaders play one common role, which is that leaders are someone who can unite people into a cohesive group and lead the group to achieve a common goal. Leaders are responsible for setting the ultimate goal, promoting positive organizational culture, launching appropriate policies to manage and motivate team-members, and supervising organizational activities as well as taking remedial actions. And leaders, as stated in the given argument, acquired these roles by the demands placed on them.
Judged by common sense, one cannot hold such an intuition about how to lead a team effectively. It is not until some problems were encountered that the leaders started to understand what they should do. Take the owner of a company as an example and let’s say he is also the leader of that company. It is natural for him, as a rational human being, to hope to maximize his own utilities. Therefore, he might started by thinking that he should pay as little as possible to his employees so that the cost will be lower and hence larger profit could be earned. However, things do not actually work like this. Employees would be demotivated if they are paid insufficiently and their work quality would therefore be compromised, which deteriorates the profit of the whole company. And only after the demands of appropriate salary were noticed by leaders would they begin to think about how to set an optimal motivating mechanism. Only when the group’s needs emerged would a leader be created to satisfy those needs.
However, a leader should be able to think in advance as well, that is to say, they should not be responding to demands, but rather to create demands. Many of the worlds’ most successful companies succeeded by creating demands. Before iPhone was born, no one ever thought about they want to use their fingers to control the screen directly, instead of through a keyboard. And nowadays, an increasing number of companies are trying to predict a customer’s needs and recommend products to them accordingly. These are all examples of leaders creating demands, instead of the other way around.
In conclusion, I hold that a leader is sometimes created by demands, by responding to problems encountered, but sometimes, they are able to create demands themselves as well.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 963, Rule ID: NEEDS_FIXED[1]
Message: "needs emerged" is only accepted in certain dialects. For something more widely acceptable, try 'emerging' or 'to be emerged'.
Suggestion: emerging; to be emerged
...anism. Only when the group apos;s needs emerged would a leader be created to satisfy th...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, actually, also, but, hence, however, if, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, as well as, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2256.0 2235.4752809 101% => OK
No of words: 458.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92576419214 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62611441266 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69889839644 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 215.323595506 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517467248908 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 702.9 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 1.77640449438 450% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5693426455 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.428571429 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8095238095 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.52380952381 5.21951772744 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.377416403233 0.243740707755 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119220613832 0.0831039109588 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.149447188005 0.0758088955206 197% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.250423202849 0.150359130593 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107595399872 0.0667264976115 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.1392134831 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 100.480337079 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.8971910112 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.