Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks.
Men and Women have significant difference in their inherited physical structure. Additionally, their branis work in different way which is completely natural. Author of the statement tries to bridge the gap between these physical differences and capability to perform tasks. These physical differences includes physical and mental strength, emotional quotient etc. However, I do not agree with the author's statement as it is indefensible from both normative and empirical stanpoint.
World has undergone huge revolution in the past few years. This revolution has affected many aspects of day to day life. It was old time in human culture that tasks were divided among different genders for the sole pupose of living life effectively. A telling example of this would be ancient human history, where it was male persons job to collect food from surrounding and female accounts for cooking that meal and taking care of children. However, world has revolutionized since then. Burgeoning industries are devloping giving rise to new job opportunities.
Accounting for physical difference men are generally more stronger considering their natural muscular strength compared to women. This difference makes them suitable for many task. For example, task in agriculture industry that involves carrying heavy loads of grains from farmland to the truck transporting it. It is obvious that Men can perform these tasks with little less effort as compared to women. However, here we are talking about suitability of gender for the particular task. Women might have to take little extra effort to perform this task but she is still suitable for it. Over time body gets habituated to type of work it does constantly. So, it might be posiible that women might have to perform extra efforts to perform as same as men but that does not make them unsuitable for the task.
Cooking was majorly considered as a women's job in history. As they are more skilled towards this activity it was predominated by women across major househlds. However, in today's world men are excelling in this area and considering it as full time career option too. Many chefs in the 5-7 star hotels are men. Additionally, women are considered more elegant in dance field, having more detailed facial expression as compared to men. Women can express their feelings through facial expression more easily. But along with the time men too have sharpened their skills and many male dancers have mastered skills of it and some do it better than women.
Some people might argue that, if a person is able to perfrom some activity more easily he/she should be given preference over the other gender. The choice should be of a person about which task to choose. Though one person might take more efforts to perform a particular task but perfoms same as other gender or better one cannot conclude that men and women are not equally suitable for many tasks.
In the sum, however there are arguments to be made from both the sides. I believe that Men and Women both are equally suited for majority of the task. By working extra towards skills required same quality of task can achieved. Hence, inherent physical differences between men and women does not affect much when ut comes to performing some task.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 303, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[2]
Message: You should probably use 'include'.
Suggestion: include
...rform tasks. These physical differences includes physical and mental strength, emotional...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 399, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...t etc. However, I do not agree with the authors statement as it is indefensible from bo...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 54, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'stronger' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: stronger
...r physical difference men are generally more stronger considering their natural muscular stre...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 171, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun task seems to be countable; consider using: 'many tasks'.
Suggestion: many tasks
...This difference makes them suitable for many task. For example, task in agriculture indus...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 60, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... considered as a womens job in history. As they are more skilled towards this acti...
^^
Line 7, column 238, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: fulltime
...ling in this area and considering it as full time career option too. Many chefs in the 5-...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 238, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'fulls'?
Suggestion: fulls
...ling in this area and considering it as full time career option too. Many chefs in t...
^^^^
Line 7, column 533, Rule ID: TOO_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to have'?
Suggestion: to have
...ore easily. But along with the time men too have sharpened their skills and many male da...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, so, still, then, for example, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 33.0505617978 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2727.0 2235.4752809 122% => OK
No of words: 537.0 442.535393258 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0782122905 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.81386128306 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58172027048 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 265.0 215.323595506 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493482309125 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 866.7 704.065955056 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 33.0 20.2370786517 163% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.2836544779 60.3974514979 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.6363636364 118.986275619 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2727272727 23.4991977007 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.06060606061 5.21951772744 39% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 16.0 4.83258426966 331% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302086465251 0.243740707755 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0789223666198 0.0831039109588 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0800460972167 0.0758088955206 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154814950315 0.150359130593 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0567657678002 0.0667264976115 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 14.1392134831 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.8420337079 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 100.480337079 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.