Men and women because of their inherent physical differences are not equally suited for many tasks Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to address

Essay topics:

Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.

The statement mentioned above is most popularly used statement from the past century. The central theme of the statement is men and women having physical differences makes them suited for particular task. However, from the recent decade many people are breaking this belief system.

Focus and continuous hardwork can turn the tables to your side. Since a very long time, people belived only men are physically strong but during the past decade we have observed a humungous change in it. Even women started winning olympic medals on massive physical sports such as weight lifting and boxing. For instance, Karanam Malliswari an Olympic gold medal winner for India was the first women to achieve it and she pointed out that they are equallt suited for all the tasks

During the 19th century, lot of people thought only men to be bread earners in the family. But we women being the bread earners. Opportunity to grow and educate was not provided till the last century. After providing the opportunity to grow, we observe a lot of females to be more knowledgable and scoring in the competitive examinations. The lack of oppurtunity made them not well suited for being the bread winner of family. Once such an opportunity is given, they have made themselves well suited.

During the 19th century, majority of people thought only women can cook. If you see in the present world there are more male chefs than female chefs for the profession of cooking. We need to break such stereotypes based on gender. There is no such thing as phycial differences making them suited for a particular task. It only hard work and willingness to do that work, that makes them suited for the task.

However, there are few situations which the anatomy of human body play a key role. For instance, only women can give birth to babies. The genetics of human beings are defined only for women to give birth to baby. But the developments in the science and technology may bring down this haunting difference too. Research is going on for the men to support pregancy and have the baby in thier stomach.

Professionly, men and women are equally suited for all types of tasks. There can't be any gender based physical difference that points out to make the particular gender superior or inferior. With the right amount of hardwork, everyone is suited for every task.

Votes
Average: 5.8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 11, column 78, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ly suited for all types of tasks. There cant be any gender based physical difference...
^^^^
Line 11, column 261, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ork, everyone is suited for every task.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, well, for instance, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1951.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 400.0 442.535393258 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8775 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44458457616 2.79657885939 87% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5225 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 613.8 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.1217068308 60.3974514979 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.04 118.986275619 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 23.4991977007 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.28 5.21951772744 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.83258426966 228% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248385405104 0.243740707755 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0676023088613 0.0831039109588 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0508124392323 0.0758088955206 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131949344299 0.150359130593 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0386223575129 0.0667264976115 58% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 14.1392134831 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 48.8420337079 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 12.1743820225 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 100.480337079 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.